they don't stay in one place also they helped us create lots and lots of plants are spread out in the whole wide world.
Advantages of being a hunter-gatherer include a diverse diet, knowledge of Natural Resources, and strong community bonds. However, disadvantages may include vulnerability to food shortages, exposure to environmental risks, and limited technology for efficient resource management.
Some advantages of being a hunter-gatherer include having a diverse diet with fresh foods, being physically active through foraging and hunting, and having a close-knit community bond through sharing resources and skills. Additionally, hunter-gatherer societies often have a deep connection to the natural world and ecological knowledge.
Pros of being a hunter-gatherer include a close connection to nature, self-sufficiency, and a simpler way of life. However, cons may include a lack of access to modern amenities, potential food scarcity, and susceptibility to environmental challenges.
Some of the challenges and drawbacks of being a hunter-gatherer include: Insecurity of food supply: Hunter-gatherers relied on the unpredictability of hunting and gathering, which at times resulted in periods of hunger and food scarcity. Nomadic lifestyle: Hunter-gatherer groups were often mobile, following animal herds and seasonal resources. This required constant movement and limited the establishment of permanent settlements. Lack of technological advancements: Without advanced tools and technology, tasks such as farming, building permanent structures, and food preservation were difficult or impossible to accomplish, imposing limitations on their quality of life.
Some disadvantages of being a hunter-gatherer include uncertainty in finding food sources, vulnerability to environmental factors like weather and natural disasters, and limited access to healthcare and technology. Additionally, the nomadic lifestyle can lead to social isolation and conflict with neighboring groups over scarce resources.
Hunter-gatherer societies rely on hunting and foraging for their food, rather than engaging in agriculture. They often live in small nomadic groups, moving to follow the availability of resources. Social structures are typically egalitarian, with a focus on sharing and cooperation within the group.
Some advantages of being a hunter-gatherer include having a diverse diet with fresh foods, being physically active through foraging and hunting, and having a close-knit community bond through sharing resources and skills. Additionally, hunter-gatherer societies often have a deep connection to the natural world and ecological knowledge.
Evidence such as his tools and gear, such as a bow and arrows, a dagger, and containers for carrying food, suggest that Otzi was a hunter. Additionally, his diet was consistent with that of a hunter-gatherer, as shown by the analysis of his stomach contents. His clothing and equipment also indicate a lifestyle of hunting and foraging for food.
that hunter farmers plants things.
Some of the challenges and drawbacks of being a hunter-gatherer include: Insecurity of food supply: Hunter-gatherers relied on the unpredictability of hunting and gathering, which at times resulted in periods of hunger and food scarcity. Nomadic lifestyle: Hunter-gatherer groups were often mobile, following animal herds and seasonal resources. This required constant movement and limited the establishment of permanent settlements. Lack of technological advancements: Without advanced tools and technology, tasks such as farming, building permanent structures, and food preservation were difficult or impossible to accomplish, imposing limitations on their quality of life.
Some disadvantages of being a hunter-gatherer include uncertainty in finding food sources, vulnerability to environmental factors like weather and natural disasters, and limited access to healthcare and technology. Additionally, the nomadic lifestyle can lead to social isolation and conflict with neighboring groups over scarce resources.
There are both good and bad things about hunter gatherer societies. The good thing is that there is a clear division of labor in these societies. Men hunt and women gather, and both groups contribute equally to the health of the group. The bad thing is that the animals may migrate or the plants may wither, and that means constantly being on the move.
Hunter-gatherer societies rely on hunting and foraging for their food, rather than engaging in agriculture. They often live in small nomadic groups, moving to follow the availability of resources. Social structures are typically egalitarian, with a focus on sharing and cooperation within the group.
Hunter-gatherer men typically hunted animals for food, providing protein and nutrients for the group. Women were usually responsible for gathering plant foods and taking care of children. Both genders played crucial roles in providing for the group's survival and well-being.
Living in a community city civilization offers several advantages over a nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle. Firstly, settled communities provide a stable and secure environment with access to consistent food sources, reliable shelter, and protection from external threats. Additionally, community living allows for division of labor and specialization, fostering technological advancements, social connections, and cultural development. Overall, the community city civilization offers safety, convenience, and opportunities for personal and societal growth that are typically not found in nomadic hunter-gatherer societies.
it is not possible that all the people of the earth say on cities,towns etc... some human being like hunter, tribal peoples, gatherer who are living in forest and hence adapt 2 forest .. :P
A surplus of food came from farming, and this surplus provided the means to go beyond a struggle for survival to being able to divert resources to cultural activities and so begin the process of civilisation.
Agriculture. For without that one must be a hunter-gatherer, thus having no time for any other activity than hunting or foraging, certainly not being able to develop a complex society, or the rule of law.