The advantages with using animal organs for transplants to human's (xenotransplantation) are that humans that are in need of an organ, will not have to wait as long. People who are on the donor list have to wait a long time for the organ they need, as blood type, size and the death of someone willing to donate their organs, need to be beared in mind. Hope this helps
People seem to assume that xenotransplantation happens far more frequently than it actually does occur. Animal organs are not used at all frequently, since animal organs are not similar to human organs, and are not suitable for maintaining function within the human body. They simply do not work.
In very rare circumstances they can be used to try and bridge a gap until a human organ becomes available. They are never used as a long term solution (because they do not work long term).
Whether they should be used or not is practically irrelevant, since they cannot be used as a long term solution.
Please see related link for more indepth information on xenotransplantation.
coz it would react badly victoria thomas is not a legend =] Some religions dont allow you to have animal organs e.g Jewish and Muslims are not aloud pigs organs.
The most likely kidney donors are immediate family.
Xenotransplantation can help save lives as there is a shortage of human donors, but is it right to kill the animals for organs?
Generally they're not used, since animal organs are not similar to human organs, so are not suitable for maintaining function within the human body. In very rare circumstances they are used to try and bridge a gap until a human organ becomes available. They are never used as a long term solution (because they do not work long term). Whether they should be used or not is practically irrelevant, since they cannot be used as a long term solution.
It once was thought that stem cell transplants were not safe in patients over age 60, but new research shows that elderly patients can safely receive stem cells from donors.
The graph hows that from 1995 - 2004, the number of donors has decreased, as has the number of transplants being carried out; the number of people needing transplants however, has significantly increased. This means that there is an in balance between the number of organs available for transplant and the number of organ donors, which means that there will obviously not be enough organs to provide each, or even most of those on the transplant list (in need of an organ) with the organ that they need.
It'll make it easier to match donors to patients needing transplants.
I dont know that is why i asked!! It is for my current events!! it is either 152 967 754 525
No. The blood type is one factor considered in matching transplant donors and recipients in some transplants. Most types of transplant use another system of tissue typing.
Kidney transplants are most often carried out (which indicates that they are needed frequently). However persuading donors to donate their liver is particularly difficult, due to popular misconceptions about the person who may receive their liver (i.e alcoholics or drug users). Thus livers are 'needed' more often than kidneys are, since there's fewer livers to go around.
There have been thousands of organ donors in Tamil Badu. Tamil leads that nation in donors. The exact number of donors is unknown.
It is named after Stephen Christmas who was one of the first patients diagnosed with the disease in 1952 and was studied by researchers in Oxford, England. He had many blood transplants through out his life and he ended up dying from developing AIDs from one of his donors.
Organ transplants should always be performed on the recipient when their heart is beating, otherwise the outcome of the operation is likely to be poor. The exception is heart transplants, when the heart has to be stopped momentarily in order for it to be grafted into the patient. But typically, it's necessary for the patient to have a heartbeat in order to sustain life.Sometimes organs are removed from the donors when their hearts are beating. These donors are referred to as having suffered "brain stem death", and are sometimes classified as "heart-beating donors".They have suffered irreparable damage to the brain stem, (where the brain attaches to your spine) which is where the brain controls vital actions such as breathing. Usually, this is the result of something such as a car crash, something heavy falling on their head, or sometimes meningitis.Without a ventilator, these donors would cease to have a heart-beat within minutes, due to lack of oxygen. From MRI images and other thorough medical checks, it is clear that these donors do not have any awareness of their surroundings, or any degree of conciousness. A number of stringent medical checks are made before organ donation is considered.Brain-stem death is not the same as a "coma", or a "persistent vegitative state", in which the patient may show some conciousness on an MRI or similar. The above are considered, to some extent, "reversible", whereas brain-stem death is not.To keep the organs in good condition the donor has to be ventilated (and have a heart-beat) until the organs are removed, to prevent the organs from degrading. This means that, to some extent, the donor will still appear pink and feel warm, even though they are, by definition and medical tests, dead.Non-heartbeating donors (sort of the opposite of "brain stem death" donors) usually die of something like a heart-attack - i.e anything which stops their heart from beating. Because of the lack of heartbeat and hence ventilation, organs have to be prepared and retrieved very quickly to prevent them from degrading. (Usually, the donor would have to die actually in a hospital for this to be achievable). Clearly, non-heartbeating donors are never used to provide heart-transplants.