There are no advantages.
The tidal power station is always better because it uses renewable energy. The tides will keep coming in tomorrow if we use them for electricity today. So the tidal power will last as long as the sea keeps moving.
The oil fired power station needs new oil all the time. Oil is a non-renewable resource. When we burn the oil, we have to go and find more for tomorrow. And oil is becoming harder and more expensive to find and produce.
Oil is a fossil fuel, and burning fossil fuels like oil, coal and natural gas contributes to the production of carbon dioxide which is a greenhouse gas..
Actually, there is one advantage - an oil fired power station can be built anywhere, not just by the sea or on a river
The advantage is that it causes pollution :-)
Natural Gas develops a fossil fuel. Also it is transported by a power plant.
Uranium is not a fossil fuel; uranium is used as nuclear fuel for nuclear power reactors.
A fossil fuel
the animals die first.
Power stations and auto mobiles are two things that use fossil fuels.
A fossil fuel power plant is a system of devices for the conversion of fossil fuel energy to mechanical work or electric energy
Coal Advantage *World's most abundant fossil fuel; *Large resource base. *Relatively cheap to mine and transport by rail.
Some power plants do. Any plant that burns oil, coal, or gas from underground resources could be considered a "fossil fuel" plant. There are however nuclear, solar, hydro-electric and wind powered power plants.
Nuclear power is NOT a fossil fuel.
They both use steam turbine/generators
The fuel cost is lower than for fossil fuel, so once the plant is built it tends to be run continuously on base load at full power, to take advantage of this. Taking the high building cost into account, there is probably not much difference overall between nuclear and fossil.
It provides them with power, without polluting the environment like a fossil fuel power plant would.
Both power plants generate electricity, but a fossil fuel power plant burns coal, oil, or gas to produce heat that boils water into steam to drive a turbine, while a nuclear power plant uses nuclear reactions to heat water into steam. Nuclear plants produce no greenhouse gas emissions, while fossil fuel plants do. However, nuclear plants produce radioactive waste that needs to be safely managed for a long time.
To convert the heat of combustion to steam which can be used in an engine.
no it is not
A fossil fuel power plant is a factory that generates electricity, sells it to the power companies, and they sell it to us.Power plants burn fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) to turn water into steam. This steam is used to spin the electricity turbines, generating electricity.Fossil fuel power plants have the big disadvantage of carbon dioxide emissions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is building up in the atmosphere causing global warming.The opposite of a fossil fuel power plant is a renewable energy power plant, which generates electricity without any harmful carbon dioxide emissions. Renewable energy (solar, wind, water, hydro, tidal and wave, geothermal, ocean thermal, biomass, biofuel and hydrogen) is being used more and more around the world, replacing old polluting power stations.
Fossil fuel like coal or natural gas is brought to the power plant by trains. Then it is burned to heat water to make steam. The steam is under pressure and it wants to escape, so it is run through a turbine and the power of steam spins the turbine. The spinning turbine runs and electric generator that makes electricity.