whatever you want the advantages to be.
Hydroelectric power is about 90% efficient while fossil fuels are about 60% efficient.
No, hydroelectric power is produced from the movement of water spinning a turbine. Fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) produce energy by burning.
Hydroelectric power is an alternative to production of electricity produced by fossil fuels
No, hydroelectricity is a Alternative energy resource.
No it is its own source of energy
Because neither burns fossil fuel to create energy, and neither causes pollution.
Fossil-fuel power stations, hydroelectric power stations and nuclear power stations.
Hydroelectric is ultimately solar power. The water that powers the dams is brought in from the ocean by solar evaporation that returns to the earth in the form of rain or snow. Aside from the costs (not just money but also environmental) of building dams, hydroelectric power is free for the taking.
Nuclear power is NOT a fossil fuel.
hydroelectric energy is free to the fuel fossil
Hydroelectric power flows out of the generators and gets stepped up to transmission levels for transportation to the towns and cities where it is consumed. Once the hydroelectric power reaches the transmission system, it joins power provided from fossil fuel, nuclear, wind, and solar power generators on its way to metropolitan areas.
In general, hydroelectric power generation is much cheaper than plants using fossil fuels. In the second attached link, it is stated that the average operating cost for a hydroelectric plant is around six cents per kilowatt while an fossil fuel power plants operating cost average is above 2 cents per kilowatt.