0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is leadership more important in a large unit or a small unit?
It is equally important in both as the path changing decisions have to be taken by few people or else there will be too much of conflict.
Advantages of critical path analysis?
Advantages of CPA · It requires careful planning so projects can run smoothly · Improves efficiency and cash flow, so materials can be ordered to arrive only as they are needed · If problems happen they can be identified quickly, this will mean that informed decisions could be made
Difference between strategy and planning?
In business, strategy is abstract while planning is more concrete. A strategy describes a global path to achieve a goal. Planning on the other hand, is the allocation of resources necessary to accomplish the strategy.
What are the Benefits of goal setting?
I just have a one word answer for you "Knowing". When you know you're going to achieve your goals you know you've succeeded. So why not know what it is you want and know that you can achieve. Yes it is that simple one word "Knowing". ~ Goal setting is required within any good business to establish where you are in the sense of business and where you need to be to improve or achieve something (Goal). When setting goals you will set up a "path" in the planning stage of how your going to achieve the goal, who will be involved, what everyones responsibilities are to aid you getting there. You will set a date (normally) against the goal so that you know WHEN you need to have achieved your aim. However, you will also set up review points between starting the path to achieve and actually achieve. These are used to make sure everyone is where they need to be and done what is required to get you tothe gaol point. If anything or anyone is causing a stoppage it is debated and actions put in place at review meetings to either remove an obsticle or work around it.
Advantages of CPM?
Critical Path Method has several advantages. Below are just SOME of the many benefits:Critical path and slack time analysis help managers to pinpoint important activities that need to be closely watchedIt is useful for scheduling and controlling large projects (allows you toProject documentation and visual representations makes assigning/identifying person in charge of each activityIt is fairly straightforward (does not require very complex mathematical calculations)Can be drawn in the form of a network model which allows for a visual representation of the relationships among project activitiesThis model can be applied to a variety of different projectsUseful for monitoring both schedule times and cost
What are the advantages and limitations of the path goal approach to leadership?
The advantage of the path-goal theory is that managers can select from many different leadership theories that are available. The limitation of the theory is that they will be limited in their selection of theories due to the job requirements and existing organizational culture.
What are the advantages and limitations of the path-goat approach to leadership?
The path-goal theory of management is based on the leader's ability to choose the appropriate style for the organization in order to reach certain goals. The path-goal theory is based on the idea that specific actions will result in a known outcome.
How does servant leadership differ from path goal theory?
Servant leadership focuses on leaders serving the needs of their followers to help them grow and reach their potential. Path-goal theory, on the other hand, emphasizes how leaders can help followers achieve their goals by providing guidance, support, and removing obstacles in the path to success. While servant leadership is rooted in humbly serving others, path-goal theory is about facilitating achievement through effective leadership behaviors.
Which path goal leadership style leads to greater satisfaction when tasks are ambiguous or stressful?
directive
Which path-goal leadership style leads to greater satisfaction when tasks are ambiguous or stressful?
directive
What does the path goal leadership theory entail?
The manager articulates the objectives (the goal) to be accomplished and how these can and should be completed (the path) to earn rewards. This theory encourages managers to facilitate job performance
Is Walmart's leadership a normative or path goal theory?
Walmart's leadership can be characterized as a blend of both normative and path-goal theories. Normative theory focuses on leaders setting standards for behavior, which aligns with Walmart's emphasis on corporate values and ethics. Path-goal theory, on the other hand, emphasizes the leader's role in clarifying goals and removing obstacles for employees, which is evident in how Walmart's leadership provides guidance and support to its workforce.
What is the definition of path-goal theory?
Path-goal theory is a leadership theory that suggests a leader's effectiveness is determined by how well they help their followers achieve their goals by clarifying the path forward, removing obstacles, and providing necessary support and rewards. It focuses on how leaders can motivate followers to reach their objectives by adapting their leadership style to the needs and characteristics of their team.
What is the path goal theory?
Path-goal theory is about fit between motivation, behavior, environment, tasks, and reward (Evans, 1970; House, 1971). It traces its origins to expectancy theory, situational leadership and contingency theory, and builds upon all three. Path-goal theory is therefore about flexibility.
What are the weakness of the path goal theory?
Path-goal theory is about fit between motivation, behavior, environment, tasks, and reward (Evans, 1970; House, 1971). It traces its origins to expectancy theory, situational leadership and contingency theory, and builds upon all three. Path-goal theory is therefore about flexibility. From expectancy theory, path-goal finds that motivation works best by encouraging followers in their strengths and rewarding them for their efforts. The leader identifies the development level of the followers as well as the supportive and directive behavior criteria to be filled. In the situational leadership model this corresponds to delegating, supporting, coaching and directing behaviors. Where path-goal deviates from situational leadership is in the leaders need to be able to adapt to the characteristics of the followers and the task at hand. Additionally flexibility is needed not only on the behavior of the leadership in understanding the needs of the followers, but also to the environment the organization is operating as well has the internal workings of the organization itself. This ability to adapt to environment and internal operational parameters is the foundation of contingency theory. The objectives that path-goal theory follows to evaluate the surroundings and personalities are (a) define goals, (b) clarifies path, (c) remove obstacles and provide support. Based in the typology, path-goal theory offers, "…a large set of predictions for how a leader's style interacts with subordinates' needs and the nature of the task. Among other things, it predicts that directive leadership [directive] is effective with ambiguous tasks, that supportive [coaching] leadership is effective for repetitive tasks, that participative [supporting] leadership is effective when tasks are unclear and subordinates are autonomous, and that achievement-oriented [delegating] leadership is effective for challenging tasks." (Northouse, 2004, p. 144) Strength of path-goal typology is therefore based on the situational framework of understanding how achievement-oriented (delegating), participative (supporting), supportive (coaching) and directive (directive) behaviors affect the productivity and satisfaction of the followers. Additionally path-goal theory integrates the motivation principles of expectancy theory with the adaptation to environment and internal organizational parameters of contingency theory. Though flexible in nature, path-goal theory in itself is also complex and counter intuitive; herein lies its criticism. "Path-goal theory encompasses so many interrelated sets of assumptions that it is hard to use this theory in a given organizational setting"
What are the weaknesses of the path goal theory?
Path-goal theory is about fit between motivation, behavior, environment, tasks, and reward (Evans, 1970; House, 1971). It traces its origins to expectancy theory, situational leadership and contingency theory, and builds upon all three. Path-goal theory is therefore about flexibility. From expectancy theory, path-goal finds that motivation works best by encouraging followers in their strengths and rewarding them for their efforts. The leader identifies the development level of the followers as well as the supportive and directive behavior criteria to be filled. In the situational leadership model this corresponds to delegating, supporting, coaching and directing behaviors. Where path-goal deviates from situational leadership is in the leaders need to be able to adapt to the characteristics of the followers and the task at hand. Additionally flexibility is needed not only on the behavior of the leadership in understanding the needs of the followers, but also to the environment the organization is operating as well has the internal workings of the organization itself. This ability to adapt to environment and internal operational parameters is the foundation of contingency theory. The objectives that path-goal theory follows to evaluate the surroundings and personalities are (a) define goals, (b) clarifies path, (c) remove obstacles and provide support. Based in the typology, path-goal theory offers, "…a large set of predictions for how a leader's style interacts with subordinates' needs and the nature of the task. Among other things, it predicts that directive leadership [directive] is effective with ambiguous tasks, that supportive [coaching] leadership is effective for repetitive tasks, that participative [supporting] leadership is effective when tasks are unclear and subordinates are autonomous, and that achievement-oriented [delegating] leadership is effective for challenging tasks." (Northouse, 2004, p. 144) Strength of path-goal typology is therefore based on the situational framework of understanding how achievement-oriented (delegating), participative (supporting), supportive (coaching) and directive (directive) behaviors affect the productivity and satisfaction of the followers. Additionally path-goal theory integrates the motivation principles of expectancy theory with the adaptation to environment and internal organizational parameters of contingency theory. Though flexible in nature, path-goal theory in itself is also complex and counter intuitive; herein lies its criticism. "Path-goal theory encompasses so many interrelated sets of assumptions that it is hard to use this theory in a given organizational setting"
What does the path-goal leadership theory entail?
The path-goal leadership theory focuses on how leaders can help followers reach their goals by providing direction, support, and motivation. It emphasizes that leaders should adapt their style to the needs of their followers and the situation at hand to enhance performance and job satisfaction. The theory suggests that leaders can achieve this by clarifying goals, removing obstacles, and offering rewards.
