0
The aims of specialization in nuclear physics are the same as that for every field of work: to focus the efforts within a given field into solving the most pressing questions, concerns, and issues that are currently around. Some current specializations within nuclear physics include radioactive decay, nuclear fusion, nuclear fission, and the production of new elements and isotopes.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Galileo galilie specialization?
Galileo Galilei's specialization was physics and mathematics.
Nuclear physics is the field of physics?
Nuclear Physics is a field of physics, yes. It involves interactions between atomic nuclei. Nuclear fission, nuclear fusion, nuclear decay (though in some ways that is more particle physics).
What was chine-shiung wu's area of specialization in science?
Chien-Shiung Wu's specialization was experimental physics. She is referred to by many as the First Lady of Physics.
What is nuclear physics dictionary?
And I believe this belongs in "nuclear physics," and I should know, I'm nuclear.
When was Nuclear Physics News created?
Nuclear Physics News was created in 1990.
What are the significance of nuclear physics?
Nuclear Power
Which is radioactivity physics or chemistry?
Physics; more specifically, nuclear physics.
When was Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics created?
Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics was created in 1949.
When was Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics created?
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics was created in 1959.
What has the author P E Hodgson written?
P. E. Hodgson has written: 'Nuclear physics in peace and war' -- subject(s): Moral and ethical aspects, Moral and ethical aspects of Nuclear warfare, Nuclear energy, Nuclear physics, Nuclear warfare, Popular works 'Introductory nuclear physics' -- subject(s): Nuclear physics 'The optical model of elastic scattering' -- subject(s): Nuclear optical models, Nuclear optical potentials, Elastic scattering (Physics)
What is the science behind nuclear power?
Nuclear Physics
Is nuclear physics engineering?
no
