answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Pro: natural means of population control,

Cons: Many people will die , always a chance a cure won't be found .

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the arguments both pro and con of another flu pandemic occurring?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

If you have compeling arguments on both sides of the research question you may want to search for and take notes on what?

Both arguments


What should you search for and take notes on if you have compelling arguments for both sides of a research question?

When doing research on compelling arguments for both sides of a research question, you should search for and take notes on the arguments for both sides.


What are some potential benefits of playing devils advocate when working with arguments both as a reader and as a writer?

Playing devil's advocate when working with arguments gives you an opportunity to understand another point of view and write from that frame of reference.


What Latin root means 'in front of' or 'occurring before'?

Prae- is one Latin root that means 'in front of, occurring before'. Pro- is another. Either way, both also may function as prepositions in a sentence.


An example for the suffix demos?

Pandemic and Epidemic are both examples for the suffix demos.


Which is not true about opening arguments?

The judge gives the speech is not a true statement about opening arguments. During opening arguments both sides of the case are given by the prosecutor and the defense lawyer.


You find that there are compelling arguments for opposing arguments in response to your research question what can you do?

Both arguments Pick the position you think you can argue most persuasively for Do more research to try to break the "tie"


What supreme court procedure involves justices hearing oral arguments and expert testimony by both parties in a case?

Public arguments


What are the distinguished features of cogent and uncogent arguments?

Both are inductive arguments, cogent is strong with all true premises, uncogent is either weak, or strong but with one or more false premises or both.


How do you answer a do you agree question in RE?

Present both arguments and explain what you view is.


Can both actual and formal arguments can have the same name?

Yes, they can.


Are all the elements naturally occurring manmade or both?

Not all the elements occur naturally; some elements are man-made.