this character has a steady and intelligent mind giving him the ability to create the cunning way of killing the two girls so that he wouldnt become bancrupt he also usee his way with animals to get past the tricky parts of doors and windows so that he used a snake through the ventalater
Dr. Roylott's violent temper, possession of a trained snake, and motive to inherit the estate by eliminating potential heirs were clues to his role as the murderer. Additionally, his attempts to prevent others from investigating the deaths further suggested his guilt.
Oedipus is encouraged to use the method of questioning witnesses and suspects to discover the identity of the murderer of King Laius. This method involves interviewing individuals who may have information about the crime to gather clues and piece together the truth.
The feminine form of "murderer" is "murderess."
Oedipus is encouraged to use the method of questioning witnesses and gathering clues to discover who murdered King Laios. He is told to consult the blind prophet Teiresias for insight into the crime.
The feminine form of the word "murderer" is "murderess."
Murderess.
he waited for Roylott's next attack
Dr. Grimesby Roylott trains his snake to climb down a false bell pull to bit Julia Stoner in her sleep. So, while the snake's poison kills Julia Stoner, it is widely held that Dr. Roylott is her murderer. -Major Spoiler- At the end of the story, Holmes remarks that he feels no guilt for HIS responsibility in turning the snake on Dr. Roylott. This epitomizes the notion in detective fiction that poetic justice is justice. (Roylott dies at the wrong end of his own tactics)
Dr. Roylott's wife was named Mrs. Stoner.
The murderer is never positively identified, but if you watched the movie closely, you should have come to the same conclusion as Kojak; that Teddy Hopper was the real murderer, although Kojak did not suspect him at first. And there were other clues as well.
Holmes vs. Dr. Roylott: Dr. Roylott stepped back swiftly forward, seized the poker, and it into curve with his huge brown hands, then Holmesstraightened it out again. Helen vs. Dr. Roylott: Dr. Roylott killed Julia and he wants to kill Helen. Dr. Roylott vs. Nature: Roylott shut himself up in his house and seldom came out save to indulge in ferocious quarrels with whoever might cross his path. Violence of temper approaching to mania has been hereditary in Roylott.
yes
It's hard to say. Probably underestimating Holmes and believing that his trick with the poker would scare him off. Miss Stonor's wedding was far enough off that Dr. Roylott could have postponed his efforts until Holmes would lose interest. Holmes would not have stayed at the local pub indefinitely. Holmes might have foiled his plans in the short term but he was ingenious enough to figure out something in the long term.
Dr Roylott had spent a lot of time practicing medicine in India, which is where we assume he discovered his interest in poisonous snakes.
Oedipus is encouraged to use the method of questioning witnesses and suspects to discover the identity of the murderer of King Laius. This method involves interviewing individuals who may have information about the crime to gather clues and piece together the truth.
Turtle and Sandy were dubious about the murderer of Sam Westing because they both felt that the clues and evidence presented to them did not match up with their instincts and observations. They were skeptical of the conclusions drawn by others and believed there was more to the mystery than met the eye.
Dr. Roylott has spent a lot of time in India, studying mostly. That is also where he met his wife. He has these wild animals to remind him of India. Roylott also has other animals, including the 'speckled band', a.k.a. his deadly swamp adder, which is also 'the deadliest snake in India'. I hope this helped!!
Dr. Roylott didn't want his stepdaughters to get married because then he would have to give them large sums of money