It will entirely revolutionize our way of life. For the better, but it will be hard to adjust. If animal liberation is achieved, scientists will no longer have the option to test on animals. Most diets will have to change dramatically. No circuses, no rodeos, no leather, or any usage of animals that does not have their consent.
In present day, the movement currently offends many who believe animals are here for human usage, or believe in human superiority in general. It offends those who are unwilling to change or are just ignorant. Some animal right activists are very blunt, and many of the campaigns are abrasive and crude. The ALF commits arson and strives to damage companies that support animal use.
A previous answer that I changed is false: Animal Liberation and Human Liberation are directly connected. If we all stop eating animals, enough food and land would be more than ten times the amount it would take to feed all the starving people in the world. A cow consumes sixteen times as much food as it produces. Think of all the land currently used for livestock, the polluted waters from the fecal matter, transportation costs, etc.
Lawrence Finsen has written: 'The animal rights movement in America' -- subject(s): Animal rights movement, History, animal rights, ethics, philosophy, Animal rights
It began in the 1970s along with many other rights movements. Peter Singer's book 'Animal Liberation' is largely accepted as the cause of the animal rights movement.
In general, the animal rights movement is a social reform movement aimed as having animals viewed as equal to humans. Animal rights advocates generally believe that animals should not be used by humans in any way (even as pets), though there are "animal rights" advocates who do not hold quite that drastic a belief. Some animal rights groups actually believe more in animal welfare than animal rights.
Yes, they mean the same thing. Animal rights is the ideology behind the animal liberation movement. Animal liberation is the ultimate goal of the movement, and the latter term is used more often because I think animal liberation sounds more radical and unsettling.
Glen Martin has written: 'Game changer' -- subject(s): Animal rights movement, Animal rights activists, NATURE / Animals / Wildlife, Wildlife conservation, Animal rights, Animal welfare
An animal liberationist is an activist who is a part of the animal liberation movement, the belief in the advancement of interests and rights of animals.
Kathleen Marquardt has written: 'AnimalScam' -- subject(s): Animal rights activists, Animal rights movement, Radicals
Animal Farm relates to the Russian Revolution of 1917
Naresh Kadyan, founder Chairman of the PFA Haryana - Representative of OIPA in India is the symbol of animal rights movement in India........YES.
the cons of animal testing r- costs bunches of $$$
The Onion News Network - 2007 Should Animals Be Doing More for the Animal Rights Movement was released on: USA: 9 December 2007
Pro: living organism model Con: violates the animal's rights inefficient and ineffective, their anatomy and biological reactions are not the same (look up the thalidomide tragedy)