Want this question answered?
Yes, bioaccumulation is a noun, a singular, common, concrete noun.
i don't understand your question. are you talking about the effects of bioaccumulation?
yes.it is important
nothing
Bioaccumulation is the gradual accumulation of substances, such as pesticides or other chemicals, in an organism. Bioaccumulation occurs when an organism absorbs a substance at a rate faster than that at which the substance is lost or eliminated by catabolism and excretion.
One similarity is that both are harmful and the differences are that bioaccumulation is the accumulation of pollutants in an organism and pollution is a harmful material that is released in the environment through human activaties.
Bruce L. Boese has written: 'Synthesis of methods to predict bioaccumulation of sediment pollutants' -- subject(s): Bioaccumulation, Marine pollution, Mathematical models
Bioaccumulation
coyotes
The physical property of DDT that contributes to its bioaccumulation in animals is its inability to break down easily. This results in it being stored in the fatty issues of animals.
Joan U. Clarke has written: 'Assessing bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms exposed to contaminated sediments' -- subject(s): Effect of water pollution on, Aquatic organisms, Bioaccumulation
Yes the animal would die. This is because bioaccumulation refers to an organism's absorption of a toxic chemical at a greater rate than which it can get rid of it. Usually, the animal would have no chance of survival.