There is a risk that the procedure will not be successful. At the same time, it is not 100% percent safe. Test tube babies are at a higher risk of having weaker body mechanisms as compared to babies fertilized in the womb. This is because they are already influenced by the outer atmosphere during their fertilization, which is the critical period. Moreover, the semen and ovum do not combine naturally, which may further lead to complications to the health of the baby. Due to these possibilities, it may be better to opt to have a baby by a surrogate mother than a test tube baby.
Test tube babies are concieved in test tubes. Naturally concieved babies are concieved during sexual intercourse
Those who disapprove of test tube babies would probably say that God intended for conception to occur in a uterus, not in a test tube.
No test tube babies can be just as healthy as a normal born baby.
The history of the test tube babies is that the first successful test tube baby was in 1978. This happened in Great Britain.
They are the same things
With "test tube babies" the only difference is that the eggs are fertilized in a lab, then implanted in the mother, or a surrogate. The same problems that can prevent normal delivery in a regular pregnancy can also prevent normal delivery in the case of test tube babies.
50
very bad
they kill u
Test Tube Babies - 1948 is rated/received certificates of: Finland:(Banned) (1950) Finland:(Banned) (1948) Sweden:15
The babies, once born, are all the same.
In vitro fertilization