Want this question answered?
It is no longer Darwin's theory, as Darwin has been dead about 130 years. There are no credible alternatives to the modern theory of evolution by natural selection. So, the differences is; the theory of evolution by natural selection is supported by myriad lines of converging evidence and explains the natural phenomenon that is evolution very well. The " conflicting theories " have no evidence supporting them and explain nothing.
Prove is a term used in math. Comparative biochemistry supports with many lines of converging evidence the theory of evolution by natural selection. For a brief example consider cytochrome C, the electron shuttle that shuttles electrons between the I and II complex of the electron transport chain. This biochemical process is highly conserved in many types of organisms, being remarkably the same process from organism to organism, but showing the expected slight genetic variation that can be tracked down the taxa to support the common ancestry of evolution.
Because it is an internally consistent explanation of a mechanism of evolution that is supported by many lines of converging evidence, that has been repeatedly tested and is capable of making testable predictions. Pretty much the scientific definition of theory.
It does not mater what anyone thinks about the theory of evolution by natural selection. The theory of evolution by natural selection is the best explanation we have for much of the observed and observable fact of evolution. The theory is internally consistent with the fact of evolution, it is supported by myriad lines of converging evidence and it generates testable predictions in the form of scientific hypothesis. The opinion of no one is needed by the theory of evolution by natural selection and educated people have come to accept the theory.
No, evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact, The theory of evolution by natural selection, which explains much about evolution, is well supported by myriad lines of converging evidence, is internally consistent, explains the natural phenomenon it should and makes testable predictions. All science. On the other hand, creationism and intelligent design are both pseudoscience. Go here for the truth, talkorigins.org
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
Yes, the theory of evolution is widely accepted as a scientific fact. It explains the diversity of living organisms on Earth through the process of natural selection, genetic variation, and adaptation over time. Multiple lines of evidence from various scientific fields support the theory of evolution.
It is no longer Darwin's theory, as Darwin has been dead about 130 years. There are no credible alternatives to the modern theory of evolution by natural selection. So, the differences is; the theory of evolution by natural selection is supported by myriad lines of converging evidence and explains the natural phenomenon that is evolution very well. The " conflicting theories " have no evidence supporting them and explain nothing.
Genetic studies, including comparative genomics. Morphological assays in comparative morphology. Developmental studies in embryology. Palaeontology, which includes studies of the morphology of extinct species. Note that one could just as easily identify ten distinct lines of evidence, or a hundred, depending on how one classifies these lines.
Prove is a term used in math. Comparative biochemistry supports with many lines of converging evidence the theory of evolution by natural selection. For a brief example consider cytochrome C, the electron shuttle that shuttles electrons between the I and II complex of the electron transport chain. This biochemical process is highly conserved in many types of organisms, being remarkably the same process from organism to organism, but showing the expected slight genetic variation that can be tracked down the taxa to support the common ancestry of evolution.
The lines of evidence are multitudinous and in order to find some of the answers you will need to study long and hard at length and in depth, as so many have done since before Darwin. Take a university degree course and be enlightened. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent
Because it is an internally consistent explanation of a mechanism of evolution that is supported by many lines of converging evidence, that has been repeatedly tested and is capable of making testable predictions. Pretty much the scientific definition of theory.
It does not mater what anyone thinks about the theory of evolution by natural selection. The theory of evolution by natural selection is the best explanation we have for much of the observed and observable fact of evolution. The theory is internally consistent with the fact of evolution, it is supported by myriad lines of converging evidence and it generates testable predictions in the form of scientific hypothesis. The opinion of no one is needed by the theory of evolution by natural selection and educated people have come to accept the theory.
keep it brief.
No, evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact, The theory of evolution by natural selection, which explains much about evolution, is well supported by myriad lines of converging evidence, is internally consistent, explains the natural phenomenon it should and makes testable predictions. All science. On the other hand, creationism and intelligent design are both pseudoscience. Go here for the truth, talkorigins.org
Ben Casey - 1961 A Few Brief Lines for Dave 1-7 was released on: USA: 13 November 1961
The description given fits that of parallel lines