What are the limitations and legal ramifications of physical chemical and psyschological restraint?

Answer 1

Question is somewhat unclear. What specific information is being sought?

A definition of the term 'physical restraint' would be - 'the force necessary to curtail or limit the movements, or limit the physical actions of, an individual.' In law enforcement terminology it is usually used to describe a physical custody situation.

Chemical restraint would probably refer to OC spray, "Mace," tear gas, or similar commercially available product that temporarily disables a struggling or resisting individual so that they may be taken into physical custody.

Psychological restraint, when used in this context, has no meaning or application. Psychological restraint implies that restraint which is self-imposed by the person themselves.

Answer 2

Physical restraint can lead to physical injury, psychological trauma, and even death, if not used appropriately. Chemical restraint may cause adverse side effects and can be considered a form of medical malpractice if not properly administered. Psychological restraint, such as coercion or manipulation, can infringe on a person's autonomy and lead to emotional distress or long-term psychological harm. All forms of restraint must adhere to legal guidelines to prevent abuse and ensure the safety and well-being of individuals.

Answer 3

Let's define the terms first as they apply in health care situations.

• Physical restraint includes holding someone down against their will; tying a person with cloth or soft restraints; or 4-point hard restraints.
• Chemical restraint uses medication to quiet, sedate, or make unconscious a patient solely for the purposes of controlling or restricting their activity or ability to speak. This includes drugging until a person is incoherent or delirious, hallucinating, etc.
• Psychological restraint is using one's power or authority to inflict fear or intimidation to make the person do what the professional wants.

There are numerous legal ramifications for of these, including a charge of a personal tort or even physical assault and patient abuse. Patients have the right to disagree, even loudly, to control their bodies and minds, and to be treated as an autonomous individual even if the patient is a child (psychological abuse). The main difference is with physican ordered soft or hard restraint, which must be in writing, and is generally only used for patient safety and for a short time only.