Want this question answered?
judicial branch checks and balances
line item veto
the legislative and judicial branch
Judicial review
Each and every branch can check the power of the other two. For example, the legislative checks the judicial and the executive by having the power to impeach judges and the president. The executive checks the legislative with the power of veto and it also checks the judicial by appointing federal judges. The judicial branch can rule both legislative laws and presidential actions unconstitutional. All of the branches are able to check each other by separation of powers, hence the term "checks and balances."
The Judicial branch has the power to interpret the laws, or decide if they are unconstitutional. The checks on the Judicial branch are the power of the executive branch to enforce the laws and the power of the legislative branch to make laws.
Yes. Because they have the power to decide laws of the congress.
The President can veto any bill that is presented to him by the Legislative branch. Also, because of judicial review the supreme court can declare bills created by the legislative to be unconstitutional.
Both the Legislative (Congress) and the Judicial (Supreme Court), have the power to keep the President's power in check.
The precedent of judicial review, as established in the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, affected checks and balances by giving the judicial branch the power to interpret the laws passed by the executive and legislative branches. It also gave the court the power to determine the constitutionality of laws.
Judicial Review is an important part of checks and balances it keeps unconstitutional laws from being passed that would give parts of the government too much power or violate the constitutional rights of the people.
Judicial Review is an important part of checks and balances it keeps unconstitutional laws from being passed that would give parts of the government too much power or violate the constitutional rights of the people.