What are the morals of thirty-eight who saw the murder didn't call the police?

Answer 1

Without knowing the person or the situation, the answer can only be very general. In most cases, morals may have nothing to do with it.

If you're speaking of a large group of people who failed to call the police, often a 'crowd mentality' is in effect. Everyone assumes that others are taking care of it so there's no need for them to get involved. Often, a large group of people (follower personalities) will not act unless directed to, or prompted by conversation to, or someone realizes that no one is acting and that spurs them to act. These prompts don't happen if the 'watchers' are all in their apartments or houses.

The other main factor is fear. People fear getting involved because sometimes, just calling the authorities can create problems for their future, such as unpleasant police interviews and being subpoenaed as a witness for a trial. This is not a frivolous fear, it can be very disruptive, upsetting, and possibly dangerous. Even people not involved in any crimes themselves can come under suspicion by police; it does happen and it can be devastating. Any serious crime, especially murder, can put witnesses lives in jeopardy. This fear is based in reality and many people know this.

Answer 2

The morals of the people who witnessed the murder in the case of "thirty-eight who saw the murder didn't call the police" can potentially include diffusion of responsibility, fear of retaliation, apathy, or a lack of trust in authorities. Each individual may have different reasons for not reporting the crime, influenced by their personal beliefs, past experiences, or social dynamics.