Of course the answer depends on where you are; for example:
The collective nouns for labourers (US spelling laborers) are:a gang of laborersa crew of labourers
No, the noun 'stuff' is not a standard collective noun.A collective noun is a noun used to group people or things in a descriptive or fanciful way.Collective nouns are an informal part of language. Any noun that suits the context can function as a collective noun; for example, a bundle of stuff or a pile of stuff (the nouns 'bundle' and 'pile' are functioning as collective nouns, telling us how the 'stuff' is grouped).
The verb 'has' is used with a singular collective noun.Example: The crowd of people has dispersed.The verb 'have' is used with a plural collective noun.Example: The crowds of people have dispersed.
AMOUNG US
The noun Apache is actually a word for a collective group of culturally related native people of the US southwest, not a specific tribe. A collective noun for people would be an appropriate collective noun for Apaches; for example a community of Apaches; a conference of Apaches; a contingent of Apaches.
The collective nouns for labourers (US spelling laborers) are:a gang of laborersa crew of labourers
There is no standard collective noun for a group of organisers (US spelling 'organizers'). Collective nouns are an informal part of language, any noun that suits the situation can function as a collective noun. For example, some standard collective nouns for people will work such as a crowd of organisers, a committee of organizers, a panel of organisers, etc.
No, the noun 'stuff' is not a standard collective noun.A collective noun is a noun used to group people or things in a descriptive or fanciful way.Collective nouns are an informal part of language. Any noun that suits the context can function as a collective noun; for example, a bundle of stuff or a pile of stuff (the nouns 'bundle' and 'pile' are functioning as collective nouns, telling us how the 'stuff' is grouped).
Some collective nouns are treated as plural, and I find this usage accurate and more and more pleasing to the ear. If a British commentator is saying something about football, for example, she/he might say something like "Manchester have proven themselves to be..." or you might hear "The US have initiated talks with..." Manchester and The US are not collective nouns in the same sense as "gaggle of geese", but I suspect that ordinary collectives are treated similarly.
There are no 'collective' pronouns; a collective noun is a word for used to group nouns for people or things, such as a crowd of people or a herd of cattle. The pronoun that would take the place of a collective noun is 'it'. For example:The farmer brought the herd of cattle into the pasture where it would stay until sundown.
That depends on where you happen to be from: In the US, collective nouns typically take the singular. Everywhere else where English is spoken, collective nouns take the plural. Ask yourself if "the faculty" is an it or a they then choose the verb's conjugation accordingly.
The collective noun is a staff of employees.
Who is the interrogative pronoun, which takes the place of the nouns, the names of the senators which are the answer to the question.
you use capitalization at the beginning of sentences, the letter I, proper nouns, titles, and names.
the ocean that surrounds us.
The verb 'has' is used with a singular collective noun.Example: The crowd of people has dispersed.The verb 'have' is used with a plural collective noun.Example: The crowds of people have dispersed.
it helps us know the thing that surrounds us