These names are not in the Bible
No those two names are not found in the King James Bible. Those names come from the Gospel of Nicodemus, which is an apocryphal book.
See related links for the names of 188 women mentioned in the King James Version of the bible.
No, King James was the English king who had the bible translated from latin to english... hence, the King James' version of the bible.
No. The King James version of the bible has omitted parts of the original documents, hence removing essential traditions and teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.
The King James Bible was adapted in 1611.
The name "Priscilla" is in the King James Version of the Bible 5 times. It is in 5 verses.
The original King James Bible has a Crown copyright. In England there are regulations on it, but not in other parts of the world. I do not know anything about the King James revised bible, but I do know that the King James does not need revised. for more information, see http://av1611.com/kjbp/. Thank you, I hope this helps in your search for answers. Christ is the Answer www.charitybaptistbillings.com
The Bible was written long before King James. And his version was not originally called the King James Bible.
King James I of England had the Bible translated into English.
King James 1st was responsible for ordering the creation of the King James Version of the Bible which was completed in 1611.
The King James Version of the bible was commisioned by King James of England back in the 1600's.