The right to all things
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Locke is right, I'm not sure about Hobbes.
jacques bossuet emphasized royal authority directly from god and quoted the bible and many psalms trying to prove his point while remaining that a king must only use his power for good and the subjects owed the prince and there was just and unjust war.(divine right) Thomas Hobbes maintained that the people should have their natural rights and follow natural law while they balanced power and it was a war of every man against every man that would have the right of self defense and doing what is done to oneself and the renouncing of all these right to a government that would protect your rights like a commonwealth.
Among other things, freedom of thought and of conscience.
Thomas Paine
the idea that a government of our own is our natural right.
Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher who lived from 1588 to 1679 CE. He was most notable for distinguishing the law of nature and the right of nature. The law of nature was a set of rules that told humans how to preserve themselves. The right of nature was a freedom to anything that seemed necessary for preservation.
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Locke is right, I'm not sure about Hobbes.
John Locke believed in natural rights, social contract theory, and the idea that individuals have the right to revolt against an unjust government. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, believed in a more pessimistic view of human nature, emphasizing the need for a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent chaos. Locke's worldview focused more on individual liberty and limited government, while Hobbes prioritized the need for strong and absolute political authority.
Both believed that all humans have the right to life, liberty, and property.
He had the government give the people peace and security.. He rejected the Divine Right of Kings and developed the phrase "Social COntract" to describe the relationship that people surrender some of their natural rights to a government in return security and peace.
John Locke http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_revolution
According to Hobbes, every person has the natural right to self-preservation, including the right to defend themselves against harm. This is because in the state of nature, where there is no common authority, individuals have to rely on their own abilities to protect their lives and secure their well-being.
jacques bossuet emphasized royal authority directly from god and quoted the bible and many psalms trying to prove his point while remaining that a king must only use his power for good and the subjects owed the prince and there was just and unjust war.(divine right) Thomas Hobbes maintained that the people should have their natural rights and follow natural law while they balanced power and it was a war of every man against every man that would have the right of self defense and doing what is done to oneself and the renouncing of all these right to a government that would protect your rights like a commonwealth.
A 17th century philosopher and educator, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) has long been famous for his pithy yet unflattering description of the natural state (or, "state of nature") of human beings as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He argued further that human life outside of civilization is an ongoing war of all against all.
Hobbes is known for his development of the social contract theory, which is the method of justifying political parties. He also believed that power should be placed in the hands of one person.
That you have to give up some of your natural right in order to make a"greater good"With the world.Dumb as hell Yeah I freaking no.
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy