I have no friends
The Bayeux Tapestry is a useful primary resource because it was made by people who were around at the time, which is what makes it primary. It is useful because it is one of few pieces of evidence used to represent what happened.
Secondary: It is probably very bias since the only eye witnesses were the soldiers.
The fact that the disease that causes it exists today, but is just less common and we have the proper medical care to take care of it.
Primary sources that are thoughtfully selected can help to bring history and cultures to life for students. Most basically, they are defined as the direct evidence of a time and place that you are studying - any material (documents, objects, etc.) that was produced by eyewitnesses to or participants in an event or historical moment under investigation. Primary sources are interesting to read for their own sake: they give us first hand, you-are-there insights into the past. They are also the most important tools an historian has for developing an understanding of an event. Primary sources serve as the evidence an historian uses in developing an interpretation and in building an argument to support that interpretation. You will be using primary sources not only to help you better understand what went on, but also as evidence as you answer questions and develop arguments about the past. Primary Sources do not speak for themselves, they have to be interpreted. That is, we can't always immediately understand what a primary source means, especially if it is from a culture significantly different from our own. It is therefore necessary to try to understand what it means and to figure out what the source can tell us about the past.
it is the opposite of primary evidence
the difference is that Primary evidence is took from that moment and secondary is a piece of evidence found from the past.
Primary evidence means original copy of evidence and secondary evidence is true copy of evidence. Chandrakant S.Sao,B.Sc.,LLB Advocate High court Bomay
Try the British Museum. I saw his death mask there and bet they have primary evidence from him.
Primary evidence consists of items that can be measured directly. If temperature readings are taken in the middle of a city for years and they keep increasing, that is primary evidence that the temperature is increasing in that city. If recent pictures taken of ice in Antarctica, Greenland, and the Himalayas are compared with those taken a century ago, they show the glaciers have decreased in size. That is primary evidence glaciers are shrinking. Any direct measurement is primary evidence.
secondary evidence for sure
The statue was created in the time Octavian Augustus was emperor. A primary source is direct evidence from people who lived in that time period. In this case the direct evidence is a statue and it is the history of a person. The statue is direct evidence so it is a primary source.
there is statistics, dairy's and photos they are counted as primary evidence relay it is anything from the time of the event
Primary and secondary sources.
A newspaper can be considered a primary source when it reports firsthand accounts of events, as it provides original information at the time of occurrence. However, it can also be categorized as a secondary source when it analyzes or interprets events that have happened, offering a perspective or commentary on the primary evidence.
Yes. Primary sources are first-hand evidence supporting a topic. Therefore, a map that directly shows evidence towards what you are stating or researching would be considered a primary source. Good luck!
It depends on what it is being used as evidence of/for.