PROS:
-wipes out a huge area
-good for ending wars
CONS:
-causes much loss of life
-gives of terrible radiation
Nuclear weapons are extremely dangerous but there are pros and cons to the use of these weapons. The pros are that it can be the answer to terrorism as these can wipe out entire cities or countries. The cons are that these weapons are highly immoral and dangerous and the effects can last for decades.
A tsunami is a naturally occurring event. There are no pros and cons to a natural event, it just IS. They are capable of causing massive destruction and loss of life.
Some Cons are: Destruction of habitats and feeding area for land animals Fish are killed in the turbine
Pros: better for environment, not as expensive, public cons: crowded, takes more time, doesnt go to your EXACT location, public
pros and cons of physiocrats
Pros- Flares, distress signals at sea can save lives - Areospace, is designed to save astronauts lives if there is a problem with the spaceship - Mining and quarrying, minerals make up our everyday things e.g phones, TV ect Cons- Bombs and weapons can kill people - destruction Thats all I can think off.... Hope it helps!
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
By 'devices' do you mean nuclear weapons, or peaceful uses of nuclear power?
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
Pros: tremendously powerful, heavily impacts enemy morale Cons: nuclear fallout, extremely negative reaction by foreign countries towards the user, initiates the possibility of mutually assured destruction.
the con of modern weapons are that they need one propellant: gunpowder, which makes thing go boom when imprperly stored
Pros: Relatively easy reaction start Usability in power plants Relatively safe if operated correctly Cons: relatively rare fuel Radioactive byproducts Byproducts can be used for weapons.