In principle, if we can identify (or even create, by genetic engineering) a highly superior form of human genetics, we could then use cloning to create lots of highly superior people. Of course, as students of history we would naturally have some caution about creating a group of people who might consider themselves to be superior to everybody else, and who might possibly seek to rule the world or otherwise dominate the lesser humans, however, it may be possible though a suitable upbringing and education, to make these superior clones into enlightened and productive citizens. It is at least an interesting idea, although it may never actually be possible to do it. Possibly cloned humans can make an important contribution to the human race, as scientists, artists, leaders, or whatever.
There are other possible uses for human clones. For example, they might be very convenient sources of organs for transplants. But that would be a very unethical use of clones.
If a person was suffering from liver failure, it could be possible to create a new liver for them through cloning.
Cloning could also be superior to transplanting as the body of a patient who received a transplanted organ may reject the new organ.
A cloned organ, on the other hand, which was made using the patients cells, would most likely not be rejected by the patients body.
if you cloned a arm which contained some sort of disease,depending on how bad it may be, could cause problems for the person who it is being transplanted to,i soubt this would happen alot though.. hope i helped :)
Doctors and hospitals would probably cut their bills by half and still make a profit, because of this cloning. So, as I said people would have to pay much less for hospital fees if we could cure people by giving them another heart/liver/lung, instead of keeping them hospitalised for months and years.
Human cloning is not real. It is a Sci-fi thing.
well i think it can benefit us, say we have a kidney problem or something you can make another one and take the kidney out of it and put it back into your own body x
yes
instead of losing a limb you could have it replaced and carry o living a life instead struggling wothout limbs
First of all before answering the question we must not forget that cloning is prohibited by all nations, and often discoraged by fundamentalists; whether it is Christianity, Islam, or Judasim. Cloning a human has a lot of advantages: first, we can find solutions to a lot of health problems; second, we can create a perfect type of human race for the coming years.
no
I'm not sure if the benefits of human cloning outweigh the coast of human dignity or not?
No.
instead of losing a limb you could have it replaced and carry o living a life instead struggling wothout limbs
First of all before answering the question we must not forget that cloning is prohibited by all nations, and often discoraged by fundamentalists; whether it is Christianity, Islam, or Judasim. Cloning a human has a lot of advantages: first, we can find solutions to a lot of health problems; second, we can create a perfect type of human race for the coming years.
no
Cloning humans.
There is no evidence of successful human cloning in the world.
Human cloning will be illegal in the US as long as there are conservatives in the country.
An "allogenic" transplant is a human-to-human transplant. (A "xenogenic" transplant would be animal-to-human).
I'm not sure if the benefits of human cloning outweigh the coast of human dignity or not?
cloning a complete human involves taking genes or cells froma human and letting them do the rest
cloning a complete human involves taking genes or cells froma human and letting them do the rest
the cons of cloning is it could destroy human kind
when dolly the sheep was bornhuman cloning was invented in