A person under a custodial investigation has rights that include being assisted by counsel at all times, even if they cannot afford one, and to have their rights explained completely to them so they understand their rights. Other rights include being allowed conferences or visits by any member of their immediate family or someone else.
Other than they must be read their Rights Against Self-Incrimination (Miranda Rights) there are no Consititutional guarantees they specifically have outside of the "normal" population of citizens. If this is insufficient you must be more specific. Give example(s) or quote a scenario.
A person under a custodial investigation has rights that include being assisted by counsel at all times, even if they cannot afford one, and to have their rights explained completely to them so they understand their rights. Other rights include being allowed conferences or visits by any member of their immediate family or someone else.
why is your bank account under investigation by your bank?
no
The science of investigation
An artificial person is an alternative term for a legal person, an organization which holds some of the rights of an individual under the law.
An artificial person is an alternative term for a legal person, an organization which holds some of the rights of an individual under the law.
Yes. People are presumed innocent unless proven guilty by a court of law.
The usual, the right to remain silent, the right an attorney basic human rights that sort of stuff
It depends on the legislation of the country in question.Generally in the west, the person has the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.
If the Non U.S. citizen is within the United States, then yes. Any person that is in the United States is protected under our flag, and therefore, have the rights stated in the Bill of Rights
If they think you did something and you just left before they could even get anything out of you, they could probably do that. There is nothing in the action that would violate the civil rights of the employee, nor constitute legal grounds for litigation.
The inital statements given by Casey Anthony were part of the investigation to find her missing child that had allegedly been taken by the nanny. She was not under arrest or a suspect in the 'kidnapping' at that time. Initially, the police were investigating a missing person.