answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The main disadvantage of fusion is that no scientists have been able to contain a fusion reaction long enough for there to be a net energy gain, but nuclear fission is already producing 11% of the worlds energy needs.The atomic bomb.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

I think the main risk is that despite a great deal of effort it may never be made to work, in a way that will produce useful power. But if it ever does succeed, it will be less risky than nuclear fission reactors.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

There will be the gradual accumulation of radiation in the components of the reactor but this will be minor. The components will be slightly more radioactive than fission waste but it will only be radioactive for 300 years compared to thousands (tens of thousands) for fission. We have the capacity and ability to store them safely for 300 years.

Secondly, we know how to adapt a fusion reactor. We have achieved a fusion reaction in two ways. One, of course is the hydrogen bomb. Two is the Joint European Torus (JET) that is the largest functioning fusion reactor today as of 2010. Our problem is that we have not achieved a reaction that has produced more power than used. Currently we are at ~65-70%. We technically could have fusion power in 5 years but it would cost about 109 billion dollars. Fusion is in it's early stages and is at least 20 years away.

Answer

I don't think we know enough about fusion and how it could be adapted to a practical power plant. Generally it is thought to be safer than fission because the nuclear waste issue is much easier to deal with.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the risks of nuclear fusion?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp