Want this question answered?
No. It was an example of what is called "docufiction."
Strengths: Natural observation allows researchers to study behavior in real-world settings, providing a more authentic representation of cognitive processes. It also allows for the study of behaviors that may not be easily replicated in a laboratory setting. Weaknesses: Natural observation can be prone to observer bias and lack of control over extraneous variables. It may also be challenging to ensure the privacy and consent of individuals being observed, and the data collected may be harder to quantify and analyze compared to controlled experiments.
This is a very big question to answer in this space. Follow the link, there you will find a lot of information.
A hypothetical anecdote is used in stories to help illustrate their points. They are short and comical or fascinating situations that usually require the reader to think about something possibly happening. These often include the words "what if."
blade needed to feed, the thirst was his only real weakness
By comparison to similar situations, real or hypothetical.
I know ... not. AS Katara is not real this is an example of a hypothetical question. The answer depends on who is answering.
Statistical population which has no real existence but is imagined to be generated by repetitions of events of a certain type.
dude make it up shes not real...
depends on what you mean strengths and weaknesses to be.... weather its muscle? "I'm strong I have alot of muscle!" or "I'm weak and can't do much" or you mean, being afraid of something. Just for example if you have ever seen the movie BOLT his strengths were things he could do like the super bark, or running real fast and his weaknesses were styrofoam packing peanuts.
(1) all kinds of sciences is there accept Nuclear Engineering and Christian theology.(2) the weakness is in the implementation. for example there is no real plant for advance machines or electronics.
Strengths of the social approach to psychology include its emphasis on the impact of social factors on behavior and cognition, its focus on real-world applications, and its ability to explain phenomena such as conformity, obedience, and group behavior. Weaknesses include potential oversimplification of complex social interactions, the risk of overlooking individual differences, and the challenge of conducting experiments that accurately reflect real-life social settings.