Want this question answered?
I think you have it wrong. The framers of the constitution wanted a federal government with limited powers. That was one of the reasons came here to get away from in England.
True, it did not set up a government. It stated the reasons for separation.
Prior Restraint. This is one of the main reasons the framers developed the first amendment of the constitution. Prior Restraint was very prevalent in the British Monarchy. When the framers established the constitution, they discussed many oppositions to British Law (one of which was prior restraint on expression). The only exception the framers eluded to was Seditious Libel (which they attempted to replicate [Alien and Seditions Act]. But it didnt pass)
To protect the people's rights.
The separation provides protection to the shareholders in the event corporation's liquidation. The shareholders are not liable more than the worth of their investments in the corporation.
Framers opposed a direct democracy for many reasons. The most important reason is because they were afraid of the rule of a majority.
States the reasons for the constitution.
A legal separation lasts indefinitely until one of the parties seeks to end the marriage permanently by divorce. A legal separation provides that the couple stays legally married. It is not a common method of ending a marriage and is done under a narrow set of circumstances such as when both parties are committed to not remarrying, perhaps for religious reasons, or for some reasons want to continue rights of inheritance. You can read more about it at the related link.
A list of reasons why the Constitution was written -apex
How many reason are giving for the constitution
There were plenty of reasons. But the separation was mainly triggered by political reasons
The Preamble