When there is a benevolent and competnt capable monarch, the advantage is that decisions can be made, and action taken quickly without sideline debate. Further #2,Decisions can be made more efficiently, and econmicaly.
hgoihilkjnlihi you cant spell mate
One could argue that a clear line of succession is an advantage of a monarchy. From the perspective of the monarchy, absolute power would be another advantage.
I can see the advantages of a constitutional monarchy, but all I can see is disadvantages if presidents were elected for life.
limited monarchy and aristocracy
absolute monarchy and constitutional monarch.
Absolute monarchy and Constitutional monarchy
There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.
The constitutional monarchy combined the countries of Austria and Hungary in a dual monarchy. The dual monarchy came about as a result of the Compromise of 1867 made the two monarchies equal. The dual monarchy collapsed after the end of World War I.
The monarchy in ancient Rome is roughly the two hundred forty years that Rome was ruled by the kings.
Monarchy comes in two varieties, absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy. That is to say, the monarch can be a dictator, or can preside over a more democratic state. In the absolute version, monarchy would be an example of autocracy. In the constitutional monarchy the ruler's powers are very limited because of the Constitution and laws of the nation.
No - Sparta had two kings.
Their aren't any arguments because the leader does not have to answer to anyone but himself and you don't have to wait for people to vote and pass bills and laws.