Every superstition is an example of the incompatibility of science and superstition. As I type, it is Friday the 13th, thought by some to be an unlucky day. So, where does this belief come from? For this conclusion to have any scientific validity, it would have to be the result of a large statistical study of the comparative frequency of good or bad events happening on Friday the 13th as compared to other days of the year. No such study exists. You can apply the same criticism to any other superstition just as easily.
When it comes to superstitions, there are none. Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies on a weakness of a believer.
+
Science and superstition are both ways that mankind tries to explain the world, his place in it, and how to exert control over it. Other than that, there are no similarities.
There is none. Superstition is completely bereft of science. However, a savvy person may use scientific techniques to gain advantage over someone who believes in superstitions.
Superstition is the belief of the supernatural, the unexplained, and the unimaginable. And for the most part, cannot be proved. Science on the other hand, is the study of just about everything and anything. Science is anything or everything that can be proved in a variety of studies. There are many branches of scicence.. such as Technology ( -ology [The study of] ). Geology, Biology, and many other branches of science. To be brief.. Superstition is anything underlying a faith of the unprovable. Science is the study of anything, that can be proved.
Science didn't evolve from superstition. It came from curiosity about the world.
Science is the antithesis of superstition. Hatred is the antithesis of love. Greed is the antithesis of generosity. Woops ... I gave three examples instead of two.
When it comes to superstitions, there are none. Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies on a weakness of a believer.
+
Nobody know when the end of the world will be. Both science and superstition have there viewpoints, but neither are significantly substantial.
Math is really the language of science.
Science and superstition are both ways that mankind tries to explain the world, his place in it, and how to exert control over it. Other than that, there are no similarities.
If it can be explained then it is not a superstition.
Science is what does the discovering, technology is how we use it.
There is none. Superstition is completely bereft of science. However, a savvy person may use scientific techniques to gain advantage over someone who believes in superstitions.
Albert Tshibangu-Wa-Mulumba has written: 'Science et superstition chez Auguste Comte' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Science, Superstition
Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid.