answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are two traits of an information source that may indicate the information given is scientifically unreliable?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why are encyclopedias a poor source of primary information?

They are unreliable.


Did Christian Bale die?

He is not dead. Wherever you heard that is an unreliable source of information


Why might you be likely to feel that an Internet source is unreliable?

When the information is posted without a specific source, the validity of the information cannot be determined or evaluated.


How do you tell the difference between a reliable source and an unreliable source?

Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.


What are some unreliable source?

Wikipedia can sometimes mislead readers because anybody can put information on that website.


What is the main function of signal words?

Indicate information from a reliable source


When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?

A secondary source may be considered unreliable if it is based on incomplete or biased information, lacks credibility or expertise, or has not been properly fact-checked or verified. It is essential to critically evaluate the source's authoritativeness and accuracy before using it for academic or research purposes.


What is reliable information?

Information that you can trust would be termed reliable. If you aren't sure of the source, or the source is someone that you don't trust, then the information would be unreliable, and you wouldn't count on it in an important situation. If the information is reliable, then you might trust it without doing your own research.


Why do historians find Livy an unreliable source of information?

Because the books she wrote had a lot of errors and was a straight forward lie as well.


When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable it is to be considered what?

When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable, it should be considered unreliable or questionable. It is important to verify information from credible sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.


Is the wind a predictable energy source?

No, it is a very unreliable and inefficient energy source.


Is a blog a reliable source?

No. Blogs contain opinions and ranting. They are unreliable.