First of all - if you observed him - you should have ceased your conversation. However - if you didn't see him - immediately report him to the judge who is hearing the case - you may be entitled to a mis-trial being declared. File a complaint against him with the State Bar Association. Ask your attorney why HE isn't taking action against him?
A client seeks out an attorney to protect his/her confidential information regarding the case the attorney is retained to protect. If the confidential information is released to the opposing attorney, the clients attorney chance of winning is dramatically reduced.
First of all - if you observed him - you should have ceased your conversation. However - if you didn't see him - immediately report him to the judge who is hearing the case - you may be entitled to a mis-trial being declared. File a complaint against him with the State Bar Association. Ask your attorney why HE isn't taking action against him?
It's known as "collusion"
The attorney who calls the witness conducts a direct examination. The opposing attorney may then conduct a cross examination. The first attorney may then conduct a redirect exam, whereupon the opposing attorney may conduct a recross exam.
Bob Ewell is the attorney opposing Atticus Finch in the novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee.
it is called objection..
Nothing "happens" unless the opposing party can provide proof to the court. Once the court rules then the attorney can face sanctions imposed by the court and, if reported, sanctions can be imposed by the state board of bar overseers. You should consult with your attorney. It's up to the opposing party to pursue it.Nothing "happens" unless the opposing party can provide proof to the court. Once the court rules then the attorney can face sanctions imposed by the court and, if reported, sanctions can be imposed by the state board of bar overseers. You should consult with your attorney. It's up to the opposing party to pursue it.Nothing "happens" unless the opposing party can provide proof to the court. Once the court rules then the attorney can face sanctions imposed by the court and, if reported, sanctions can be imposed by the state board of bar overseers. You should consult with your attorney. It's up to the opposing party to pursue it.Nothing "happens" unless the opposing party can provide proof to the court. Once the court rules then the attorney can face sanctions imposed by the court and, if reported, sanctions can be imposed by the state board of bar overseers. You should consult with your attorney. It's up to the opposing party to pursue it.
Examination of a witness by opposing counsel is called cross-examination, assuming that by "opposing counsel" you mean examining a witness that is testifying against the client of the opposing counsel. Examination by either counsel of witnesses in favor of their client's position is called direct examination.
Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
Hawks and Doves
no its classed as a "knock on" and a scrum to the opposing team is given If the ball is deliberately knocked forward then a referee can issue a penalty
If a player deliberately handles the ball, with the hands or arms, then they are guilty of deliberate handling and a direct free kick or penalty kick is awarded to the opposing team.