Want this question answered?
During the period of the Civil war and rule of August, the empire did not grow. Augustus specifically decided to establish defensible borders, with an aberration of trying to subdue a troublesome Germania. However the kingdom of Herod the Great presented itself and he took it aboard, establishing a frontier in the Palestine to add to Syria.
Neither. Rome imploded. To add to this I first changed the question so it made more sense, however, if the first questioner meant "punished", I would say that the question makes no historical sense. The western half of the Roman empire did indeed "implode" in a manner of speaking. The empire in the west headquartered in Rome, weakened itself in many ways which lead to its ultimate demise in approximately 475 AD. The empire in the east, with Constantinople as its capital lasted as the Byzantium Empire until 1453 when the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople.
The Aramaic epigraphy, the official language throughout the Roman Empire, preserves the Hebrew meaning of the verb [arag], weaving, braiding. You may add a new meaning in Aramaic, to desire. The verb form, with initial lamed, [lirag] tells us that is in the infinitive.
To add it to his Persian Empire.
The Roman Republic was a democratic nation, focused on alliances and trade and military around the Mediterranean Sea. The empire was led by a monarch, or emperor, who (in almost every way) had total control. Usually, they squandered the nation's wealth on personal wars, great palaces, and anything else that came to their desire. The republic made two generals, or consuls, control the military at all times. They owned bits of France, Italy, Greece, North Africa, the Middle East; everywhere the Mediterranean touches. The Roman Empire was more powerful, because there was a lot of military buildup; they were easily the most powerful nation in the world. Take the boundaries of their nation and stretch them. However, crime and corruption and decadence had never been seen in the Western World like that before.
Hadrian did not add any territories to the Roman Empire during his reign. He actually gave up some Roman territories. He gave the Persian back the territory his predecessor, Trajan, had conquered from them: Mesopotamia (Iraq). Hadrian pursued a policy of peace. Instead of carrying out conquests, he strengthened the fortification of the frontiers of the empire.
Marc Antony helped the Roman empire in a backhanded way. By losing to Octavian in the civil war he enabled Octavian to add Egypt and all its wealth to the Roman empire.
Hadrian's policy over the roman empire was different because he did not continue to add on to it. Rather than add more land to his empire he simply traveled around it.
Hadrian's policy over the Roman Empire was different because he did not continue to add on to it. Rather than add more land to his empire he simply traveled around it.
They conquered from westeren Spain to Central Asia. :]
Let's take a closer look at the words, here. The empire was begun in Rome, a prominent city. The empire, quite naturally, started being referred to as the Rome an empire. Drop that "e" and add the "an", and you wind up with Roman. So the name, "Roman Empire" was named after the city, not the other way around.
Rome was made a strong empire by their army and by their determination to win. To add to this, yes the Roman legions were powerful & well organized. But on the administering end of running an empire for such a long time was this factor: The Romans, unlike most empires before them offered citizenship to those they conquered. They also appointed local leaders already in the areas they conquered. This helped make the Roman presence more tolerable. They also for the most part did not persecute people of different religions. Later on however, there was a concerted effort to wipe out Christianity.
During the period of the Civil war and rule of August, the empire did not grow. Augustus specifically decided to establish defensible borders, with an aberration of trying to subdue a troublesome Germania. However the kingdom of Herod the Great presented itself and he took it aboard, establishing a frontier in the Palestine to add to Syria.
Mussolini thought he could add it very easily to his little empire.
Rome's traditional founding date was 753 BCE. It had an empire by the end of the Second Punic Wa rin 204 BCE. Augustus established the Principate, sometimes called Empire, in 27 BCE. Add whichever figure you choose to the Vesuvius eruption in 79 CE and get your answer.
Neither. Rome imploded. To add to this I first changed the question so it made more sense, however, if the first questioner meant "punished", I would say that the question makes no historical sense. The western half of the Roman empire did indeed "implode" in a manner of speaking. The empire in the west headquartered in Rome, weakened itself in many ways which lead to its ultimate demise in approximately 475 AD. The empire in the east, with Constantinople as its capital lasted as the Byzantium Empire until 1453 when the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople.
You can add text to all areas of a spreadsheet.