I dunnoo
50 to 100 million animals die worldwide everyday because of animal experimentation.
some people think that animals have rights to but others consider them less important than humans
Arguments for: Testing on animals can provide valuable information on the safety and efficacy of new drugs and treatments, ultimately benefiting human health. It can also help scientists understand biological processes and diseases that can't be replicated in other models. Arguments against: Using animals for tests can be viewed as unethical due to the suffering and harm inflicted on them. There are also concerns about the reliability and relevance of animal models to human biology, leading to potential inaccuracies in research outcomes. Additionally, advancements in alternative testing methods are making animal testing less necessary.
Kathy Snow Guillermo has written: 'Monkey business' -- subject(s): Animal experimentation, Animal rights, Animal welfare, Moral and ethical aspects of Animal experimentation, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
An animal tester is a person who engages in animal testing, the practice of using animals in scientific experimentation.
Barbara Orlans has written: 'In the name of science' -- subject(s): Animal experimentation, Moral and ethical aspects, Moral and ethical aspects of Animal experimentation
Rabbits, as well as Rats, and Mice are the most common animal experimentation victims.
Birgitta Forsman has written: 'Research ethics in practice' -- subject(s): Animal experimentation, Moral and ethical aspects, Moral and ethical aspects of Animal experimentation
well all i know is that dogs get experimented on
we experiment with animals to LEARN MORE ABOUT THEM then we have a fair knowledge about the animal(s).
Lynda I. A Birke has written: 'The sacrifice' -- subject(s): Animal experimentation, Human-animal relationships, Laboratory animals, Animal welfare
no, animal testing is a major part of science - it helps save millions of human lives every year.