Want this question answered?
none
inaccurate Observation overgeneralization selective observation illogical reasoning ideology and politics
It is counted as two errors in a typed copy. poooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
James Topping has written: 'Errors of observation and their treatment'
Yes Yes Yes Physical inventory will allow to validate book inventory system. The gaops may be because of errors or worse pilferage, spoilage etc. Both the system are required for effective controls
You can do that with Sql*Plus: SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE foo ... IS ... END foo; / SHOW ERRORS
Connecting an ammeter does not reduce the frequency errors.
Yes, it is.
It could refer to four standard errors. If an observation from a Gaussian (normal) distribution is 4 standard errors away from the mean, it has an extremely low probability.
Taking inventory more than once a year, and thus looking at stocks over shorter periods of time, often results in discovering accounting or processing errors
Many businesses are on a calendar year for accounting purposes so they can include any inventory adjustments in their December numbers if they do an inventory in January. Also, December is traditionally a busy time for most retailers, so there is a higher probability that inventory errors and discrepancies occur in December, so January is a good time to make corrections.
It means that there is a probability of 0.0968 that an observation as extreme as this occurred purely by chance.