answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Biological molecules are considered evidence for evolution include

a. DNA

b. amino acids

c. porteins

d. all of the above

Answer: D. All of the above

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?

Go to google and not to answer.com


What is the biochemical evidence that supports biological evolution?

DNA


What are the three forms of evidence supporting evolution?

-Fossil -Biological -Genetic


Is it true that the theory of evolution is supported by a wide range of biological evidence?

Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.


Is the theory true that the theory of evolution is supported by a wide range of biological evidence?

Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.


List of reasons why evolution is true?

There is strong evolutionary evidence by people such as Darwin.There is evidence in our biological structures ie: bones and DNA in particular.Although evolution (the theory) is debated there is very strong evidence (look at Darwins books and research)


Why is the geological column considered evidence for evolution?

cause of county affirs


Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?

I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.


What pieces of evidence would be considered the best for establishing biological relatedness?

a very close match in the DNA profile


What is indirect evidence?

Indirect evidence refers to information that requires some form of inference or interpretation to establish a connection to a particular fact or conclusion. It does not directly prove a point but rather provides clues or support for a theory or argument. Examples include circumstantial evidence or expert opinions.


Is there enough evidence for evolution to be true?

Yes, there is. That is why scientists refer to it as a theory, and not just a hypothesis.Various claims are made by critics of evolution; all of these are based on misapplied science and misinterpretation of facts, coupled with bad logic. Competing claims are made using "evidence" from the Bible, which as a religious document, has no application to biological study.


Why might genomics be important for evolution research?

Molecular biology allow us to study better about how molecules interact, how they communicated to perform a biological function. This will in turn help to understand how the DNA sequences of a species is being evolved from its ancestor. Also how this changed in the function of the protein it produces(evolved protein with better adaptation).