Biological molecules are considered evidence for evolution include
a. DNA
b. amino acids
c. porteins
d. all of the above
Answer: D. All of the above
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.
I do not ' believe ' in evolution, but I am convinced by the evidence.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
By looking at the fossils and seeing how they change over time.
Go to google and not to answer.com
DNA
-Fossil -Biological -Genetic
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
There is strong evolutionary evidence by people such as Darwin.There is evidence in our biological structures ie: bones and DNA in particular.Although evolution (the theory) is debated there is very strong evidence (look at Darwins books and research)
cause of county affirs
I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.
a very close match in the DNA profile
Indirect evidence refers to information that requires some form of inference or interpretation to establish a connection to a particular fact or conclusion. It does not directly prove a point but rather provides clues or support for a theory or argument. Examples include circumstantial evidence or expert opinions.
Yes, there is. That is why scientists refer to it as a theory, and not just a hypothesis.Various claims are made by critics of evolution; all of these are based on misapplied science and misinterpretation of facts, coupled with bad logic. Competing claims are made using "evidence" from the Bible, which as a religious document, has no application to biological study.
Molecular biology allow us to study better about how molecules interact, how they communicated to perform a biological function. This will in turn help to understand how the DNA sequences of a species is being evolved from its ancestor. Also how this changed in the function of the protein it produces(evolved protein with better adaptation).