Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.
I do not ' believe ' in evolution, but I am convinced by the evidence.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
Fossils can be used as evidence for evolution because they can show the development of a species over a long period of time.
In science books or on the internet.
Actually, it is the strongest evidence for evolution. Without one fossil we would know from the DNA evidence that evolution has occurred and is occurring. It is in the DNA of organisms that we see the strongest evidence for common ancestry. The products of those genes are sometimes highly conserved down the ages. Ribosomes, the workbenches on which proteins are made, differ hardly at at between you and pets.
Evolution
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
One is based of a wealth of evidence and scientific inquiry. The other is based on the idea that life is too complex and those must have had a designer.
Monkeys
There is no single piece of evidence that definitively disproves evolution. The theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields, including genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. Any challenges to the theory of evolution would need to provide substantial evidence and be subject to rigorous scientific scrutiny.
I do not ' believe ' in evolution, but I am convinced by the evidence.
evidence in which you cant touch
Accept fossil evidence, anatomical evidence, molecular evidence
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
It isn't
evidence that proves evolution