answersLogoWhite

0

Actually, it is the strongest evidence for evolution. Without one fossil we would know from the DNA evidence that evolution has occurred and is occurring. It is in the DNA of organisms that we see the strongest evidence for common ancestry. The products of those genes are sometimes highly conserved down the ages. Ribosomes, the workbenches on which proteins are made, differ hardly at at between you and pets.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the biochemical evidence that supports evolution?

DNA


Why is information stored in DNA evidence for a creator and against evolution?

DNA evidence is not specifically stored as evidence for a creator or against evolution. However, some people may argue that the complex information encoded in DNA suggests an intelligent designer, while others view it as a product of natural selection and evolution. Ultimately, interpretations of DNA evidence depend on one's worldview and understanding of science and religion.


How is DNA evidence used in evolution?

All species have the same genetic code.


What are types of evidence that suggest that evolution has occurred?

The two types are Dna, and fossils


Where we apes?

The theory says we may have been because of evolution evidence and close DNA


What two types of evidence that suggest that evolution has occurred?

The two types are Dna, and fossils


What are two types of evidence that suggest that evolution has occurred?

The two types are Dna, and fossils


Why is DNA a useful piece of evidence in studying evolution?

DNA is a useful piece of evidence in studying evolution because it carries genetic information that can show how species are related and how they have changed over time. By comparing DNA sequences, scientists can track evolutionary relationships and understand how organisms have evolved and adapted to their environments.


What A scientist makes the argument that she has found DNA evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. What would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?

For a scientist to argue that evolution does not exist based on DNA evidence, her findings would need to demonstrate that genetic mutations do not occur, that species do not share common ancestry, and that there is no evidence of natural selection influencing genetic variation over time. This would contradict the vast body of scientific evidence supporting the theory of evolution.


How fossil provide evidence that evolution has taken place?

Fossils show evidence of evolution by showing a picture to the past and through some methods how DNA of one animal may be similar to that of a modern animal.


What is the weakest part of DNA?

membrane


What is one line of evidence supporting evolution that scientists learned after Darwin's book was published?

The discovery of DNA and the ability to study genetic sequences have provided strong evidence supporting evolution by showing similarities in DNA among different species, indicating a common ancestry. This molecular evidence was not available to Darwin and has since reinforced the theory of evolution.