Biological molecules are considered evidence for evolution include
a. DNA
b. amino acids
c. porteins
d. all of the above
Answer: D. All of the above
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.
I do not ' believe ' in evolution, but I am convinced by the evidence.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
Fossils can be used as evidence for evolution because they can show the development of a species over a long period of time.
Go to google and not to answer.com
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
Evidence for evolution includes the fossil record, comparative anatomy, molecular biology, and observed instances of natural selection. These different lines of evidence all support the concept of biological evolution occurring over time.
Biological evidence of evolution includes fossil records showing transitional forms, comparative anatomy across different species revealing similarities in bone structures, and genetic similarities among related species. Additionally, the observation of natural selection leading to adaptations in organisms over time supports the concept of evolution.
Fossils are evidence of biological evolution because they provide a record of past life forms, showing the progression of species over time. By studying fossils, scientists can trace the development and diversity of organisms, providing insight into how species have evolved and adapted to changing environments.
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
The theory of evolution is supported by various forms of evidence, such as fossil records showing gradual changes in species over time, similarities in DNA between different species indicating common ancestry, observed speciation events, and the presence of vestigial structures in organisms. These lines of evidence provide a robust foundation for the theory of evolution as a fundamental concept in biological science.
No, evolution is a scientific theory supported by a vast amount of evidence. It is based on observation, experimentation, and analysis of biological data. Evolution is not a belief system in the same way that religion or ideology may be.
Paleoanthropologists are scientists who study the biological and behavioral aspects of human and primate evolution. They examine fossil evidence, artifacts, and other remains to understand the evolution of humans and our ancestors.
The three forms of evidence supporting evolution are fossil record showing transitional forms, comparative anatomy highlighting similarities in structures across species, and genetic similarities indicating common ancestry.
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
Biological evidence of the age of the earth includes the presence of fossils, the evolution of species over time as seen in the fossil record, and the molecular evidence of genetic changes in organisms that have accumulated over millions of years. These biological factors, along with others like radiometric dating of rocks, provide compelling evidence for the earth being billions of years old.