muddy area will begin to show
If you were asked to speak in a debate, "Against man-made Global Warming" you would be arguing that man is not causing Global Warming. You would have to argue that Global Warming is occurring naturally.
no.the global warming won't benefit anyone
The end of global warming would help the ozone. It is because the depletion of ozone is directly related to the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
No. Global warming is caused by man burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests. No other animal does that. If there were no humans on earth, there would be no global warming.
If global warming affects the ozone hole, the UV will come in. This will lead to more global warming.
No one would want to have global warming being caused by humans. That is not a logical position for anyone. Zero percent would WANT man induced global warming.
Global warming would have no affect on the location of the poles.
No, and I'd be delighted if You would Join Me in Asking "Why Are There No Laws Regulating Global Warming?". Bc
No, volcanoes would have nothing to do with global warming in any measurable way. Volcanoes occur for reasons outside of the issues involved with global warming.
The opposite of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in the Earth's average temperature over an extended period of time.
No, but the ice caps would be affected by global warming and their loss would cause global warming to accelerate. When the ice caps melt the sea level rises causing countries to become smaller in size.
No, that would probably be evidence for global cooling.