Uniforms stifle the creativity of a student by forcing them to abandon a major form of self-expression: clothing choice.
A strong counter argument against not having to wear uniforms is that uniforms promote school safety by easily identifying students on campus and quickly identifying intruders. Additionally, uniforms can help reduce peer pressure related to fashion choices and social status among students. Lastly, uniforms can foster a sense of equality and unity among students from different socio-economic backgrounds.
There is no direct correlation between school uniforms and safety. School uniforms can create a sense of unity and equality among students, which may lead to a more positive school environment. However, safety in schools is influenced by various factors such as clear policies, strong relationships between staff and students, and effective communication.
Having a family is important because it provides love, support, and a sense of belonging. Families offer emotional and financial support during times of need, and the bonds formed within a family can create a strong foundation for personal growth and development.
Signs of a socially healthy person include having strong and positive relationships with others, being able to communicate effectively, showing empathy and understanding towards others, and demonstrating good social skills in various social settings.
France is known for having one of the largest naturist populations per head of population in the world. With over 2 million naturists, France has a strong naturist culture and an abundance of naturist resorts and beaches.
Scottish lifestyle is characterized by a strong sense of cultural pride, a love for traditional music and dance, a fondness for outdoor activities like hiking and golf, and a passion for sports like football and rugby. The Scottish also have a rich culinary tradition, with dishes like haggis, Scotch broth, and shortbread being popular. It is common to find a strong sense of community and hospitality in Scottish culture.
because it is not an argument if you only show one side or point of view. you need to recognize that there are two sides to each story and argument
A weak argument is s choice of the end of the day. A strong argument is for many days
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. An argument is strong if the premises provide good support for the conclusion, making it likely to be true.
sound premises + strong facts + strong conclusion = effective solid argument
A Strong Argument - 1915 is rated/received certificates of: UK:U
The argument from morality posits that moral values point towards the existence of a higher being that establishes objective moral truths. While this argument persuades some individuals, others argue that morality can be explained through evolutionary processes or societal constructs, making it a debated topic among philosophers and theologians. Ultimately, the strength of this argument depends on one's perspective and beliefs.
A strong arugument is backed up with facts. If it's not a strong argument then people probably won't belive you.
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
A strong argument is one that is supported by evidence, examples, logic, and reasoning. It presents a clear and well-structured position that is persuasive to the audience. Additionally, a strong argument anticipates and addresses counterarguments effectively.
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
A strong inductive argument can be considered uncogent if the premises are not relevant or if there is a problem with the reasoning or structure of the argument. Additionally, if the premises are not true or if there is a lack of sufficient evidence to support the conclusion, the strong inductive argument may be considered uncogent.
Yes, a valid argument can still be weak if the premises provided are not strong or relevant enough to support the conclusion. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument, while the strength of an argument refers to the quality and persuasiveness of the premises.