If you take the past earthquakes and study them and how they were you can find out about where some future earthquakes might be then you can provide a warning for earthquakes about 10% of the time.
Earthquakes because they have no warning, and effect much larger ares of land.Volcanoes aren't the answer because you can get out of the waymuch faster and most of the time you will have a warning (sign) before it actually happens.---- Date: March, 20, 2013 ----
No. Tsunamis are caused by earthquakes, which cannot be predicted. Some areas have been found to be more easily damaged by a tsunami, and tsunamis can be DETECTED in time to give some warning- but not predicted.
I think earthquakes are the most dangerous. You have no warning, and they can do the most damage in the shortest amount of time. A 15-second earthquake can kill hundreds. Most other natural disasters have some kind of warning to them. The only natural disaster I can think of that doesn't give you a warning other than an earthquake is a tsunami.
The Paricutin is an active volcano located in Mexico. It erupted for the first time in the year of 1943, and the first warning signs of this even were rumbling, thunder-like noises, clouds that overshadows the skies. Then there were small earthquakes that caused a fissure in the earth, which developed in the formation of a small volcano.
Forecasters are able to give the earliest warning for impending hurricanes. Typically, they will be able to see it coming a few days to a week in advance. This is good, because it gives people time to prepare.
They do Not know how to predict when and where Earthquakes will occur in adequate time to give people enough warning in order to save lives.
Earthquakes because they have no warning, and effect much larger ares of land.Volcanoes aren't the answer because you can get out of the waymuch faster and most of the time you will have a warning (sign) before it actually happens.---- Date: March, 20, 2013 ----
No. Tsunamis are caused by earthquakes, which cannot be predicted. Some areas have been found to be more easily damaged by a tsunami, and tsunamis can be DETECTED in time to give some warning- but not predicted.
I think earthquakes are the most dangerous. You have no warning, and they can do the most damage in the shortest amount of time. A 15-second earthquake can kill hundreds. Most other natural disasters have some kind of warning to them. The only natural disaster I can think of that doesn't give you a warning other than an earthquake is a tsunami.
Yes. They must give you time to remove your personal possessions.
The Paricutin is an active volcano located in Mexico. It erupted for the first time in the year of 1943, and the first warning signs of this even were rumbling, thunder-like noises, clouds that overshadows the skies. Then there were small earthquakes that caused a fissure in the earth, which developed in the formation of a small volcano.
Earthquake prediction is currently not possible, as such, seismologists will attempt to quantify the risk posed by a particular fault zone rather than state exactly when an earthquake will occur. For more information, please see the related question.
Yes,Equador should get Earthquakes in time to time.
long term earthquakes are earthquakes that are for a long period of time and short term earthquakes are when the earthquakes are for a short period of time
all the time. like when a earthquake is about to happen the can sense it and give out warning sings
No, by the time your breaks are making a bad noise, they will have damaged the disks.
The warning was on the speed limit sign you blew by. There is no requirement for the officer to let you off on your first ticket.