in photosynthesis the light energy converted into chemical energy. carbohydrates forms, corbon fixes in leaves. all the metabolic activities in plant body depends on the energy tapped through photosynthesis. metabolic activities are must & should for all living organisms for their survival.
when photosynthesis not peformed,
1.all the metabolic activities will stop
2. due to that growth stops
3.senescence will occur
4.slowly & slowly plant leads to death & it will die.
-Oxygen would be eliminated from the atmosphere. -Carbon would fulfill its role, causing global warming.
-Producers would die, not being able to gain nutrients from photosynthesis and respiration.
-The food chain would perish due to all the dead producers.
It depends on which phase of photosynthesis you are referring to. Photosynthesis comprises the light-dependent and light-independent reactions. If a reactant that is crucial for the light-dependent reaction (such as light photons) was absent, the light-independent reaction can still carry on and hence "photosynthesis continues", per se.
However, as both light-dependent and light-independent reactions rely on one another, it would not be long till photosynthesis ceases.
Dude... The answer is obvious. It uses anaerobic respiration, creating alcohol and carbon dioxide until the alcohol becomes toxic. Then withers away and dies.
In plants, the primary source of consumable energy on earth, would no longer be able to survive as they would die out if they could not carry out photosynthesis.
Photosynthesis would not be able to initiate if there was no sun because the sun provides the energy needed to power photosynthesis. No food would be produced if there was no photosynthesis.
i really dont know lol
Most life on earth dies.
If oxygen were not produced during photosynthesis then organisms could not perform cellular respiration. This means that they couldn't produce carbon dioxide which would make the plants unable to undergo photosynthesis.
Humans themselves do not use photosynthesis, but because humans depend on plants, as well as other animals that eat plants, in order to live, no, humans could not live without photosynthesis. Unless plants had another way to make food for themselves, humans could not live without photosynthesis.
Most photosynthesis happens in leaves. But other parts of plants above the ground can photosynthesize too. Chlorophyll is an extremely important substance, without it photosynthesis could not happen. It absorbs sunlight which makes carbon dioxide and water react together hence making glucose.
The structure that photosynthesis takes place in is called a chloroplast in plants. However, not all photosynthesis takes place in the chloroplast. Photosynthetic bacteria for example have no chloroplast, and yet they photosynthesize. Another possible answer to this could be chlorophyll, but again there are differences; different groups of organisms use different types of chlorophyll to facilitate photosynthesis. Thus, I think that the only true answer to this question is that the Sun is THE structure that allows photosynthesis to occur. However, in modern times even this is technically incorrect, as photosynthesis can be stimulated by any suitable light source giving off light at the proper wavelength, for example; a lightbulb. So perhaps the only correct answer is that light itself is what allows photosynthesis to occur.
Among other things, exocytosis is responsible for releasing enzymes or various other proteins and molecules that instruct cells on how to communicate with each other. If a cell could not perform exocytosis it would be instructed on what it's supposed to do. It couldn't perform its function and the cell would eventually die.
no,.because they could not perform photosynthesis in the dark
Then plants could not make food for themselves to live.
The efficiency of photosynthesis could reduce by 25%.
Indirectly however there could be two responses. The food chain is based primarily on plants. They require sunlight to perform photosynthesis, and animals require plants to perform metabolism. Humans have evolved to a point of self-sufficiency, by which we can grow plants with artificial light.
Plants would starve and die then either we would run out of oxygen or we'd starve and so would animals
If oxygen were not produced during photosynthesis then organisms could not perform cellular respiration. This means that they couldn't produce carbon dioxide which would make the plants unable to undergo photosynthesis.
Humans themselves do not use photosynthesis, but because humans depend on plants, as well as other animals that eat plants, in order to live, no, humans could not live without photosynthesis. Unless plants had another way to make food for themselves, humans could not live without photosynthesis.
No,because animal cell do not have chlorophyll
Photosynthesis produces oxygen as a waste product.
No animal is photosynthetic. They should feed on other organisms
There are many single things possible to increase the benefits of photosynthesis. A few suggestions are: water plants; fertilize plants; or plant more plants.
could cellular respiration happen without photosynthesis explain your reasoning