No
No
One example of a challenging adaptation for species is surviving in extreme environments with high levels of radiation, such as near nuclear power plants or in highly contaminated areas. Very few species are able to develop the necessary genetic mutations to tolerate such conditions.
It might not but some animals can adapt very quick so it also might.
If the animal species is given a very long time to adapt to a slowly changing environment, then the answer is probably yes. But, taking the sloth, koala and the giant panda, all with very specialised and exclusive diets, it is difficult to see these species ever being able to adapt - unless the changes were over several centuries.
Both involve at least a few species dying out because of failure to adapt to the changing environment.
Some frogs are very adaptable to basically any situation, so it depends on the frog species. Most frogs are fairly flexible, but the one thing they probably can't adapt to very well is new predators.
Adaptation time can vary greatly depending on the individual and the situation, but it generally takes anywhere from a few days to a few weeks to adapt to a new environment or routine. The process can be influenced by factors such as the person's resilience, previous experiences, and the level of change involved.
it will become extinct. NOVANET
I think the two things for population of species if they do not adapt. The answer I think is sea turtles,and salmon.
well the animals adapt to their surroundings when they go there when they do not adapt they tend to find another place to adapt to
Species with genetic variation and diversity are more likely to survive changing environmental conditions because they may have individuals with traits that can adapt to the new conditions. Additionally, species with short reproductive cycles and large population sizes are better able to adapt quickly to changing environments through natural selection.
It's not that they must. The ones that adapt survive. The ones that don't die out.