If this matter is currently in litigation, you (or your attorney) could ask the judge to hold the company in civil contempt. If it can be proven that it was destroyed in anticipation of its being introduced into evidence, this fact could be brought out by your attorney and the jury would probably give it whatever weight it deserved in their deliberations.
How does a detective make sure that evidence is not destroyed?
There is no statute of limitations on murder in Texas. The lack of evidence would be the reason they haven't brought charges.
There is no evidence that Ryan was in a car accident.
Hatshepsut's son tried to erase evidence that she was a pharoah
It is illegal to destroy evidence at a crime and can result in jail time.
The river did not get destroyed. The civilization did. There is no evidence how it did.
There is no evidence of Ryan Kelly having been in a car accident.
No. There is no statute of limitations in any state that would permit you to sue someone 9 years after the accident. There is a policy rationale for this based on the fact that all of the witnesses and evidence will be difficult or impossible to find after such an extensive period of time. Most state statutes of limitation are 2-4 years for auto accidents.
What evidence that rutherford collected does not support Thompson's model
damage to automobile and injured people involved.
Princess Diana's forehead plastered to the windshield.
You should find evidence or witnesses from the accident to give proof (testify) that the accident was not your fault. You could also go to court...