nothing really unless you have permission to use it
With permission, yes.
No, providing proper citation does not make it permissible to use a copyrighted image without permission from the copyright holder.
Shriek is a copyrighted image. It is illegal to use this image without written permission from the whomever holds the copyright.Shriek is a copyrighted image. It is illegal to use this image without written permission from the whomever holds the copyright.
It is an image that has been put as copyright. This means others may not use this image without permission, or legal action can be taken.
Yes, an altered image is still considered copyrighted as long as the alterations do not significantly change the original work and the alterations are not substantial enough to create a new, separate copyright.
Yes, so long as it is a public domain image, and not a copyrighted one.
Not without a license.
To use others' copyrighted works, you need an exemption in the law (such as fair use) or permission from the copyright holder.
It is permissible to use a copyrighted image if you cite the source it came from.
It is safest to assume that any image created since 1923 is protected by copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise.
No; by printing it, you have infringed on the rightsholder's exclusive right of duplication.
Yes, unless you own the copyright to the image, or have authorization from the copyright holder.