It is an image that has been put as copyright. This means others may not use this image without permission, or legal action can be taken.
With permission, yes.
Shriek is a copyrighted image. It is illegal to use this image without written permission from the whomever holds the copyright.Shriek is a copyrighted image. It is illegal to use this image without written permission from the whomever holds the copyright.
No, providing proper citation does not make it permissible to use a copyrighted image without permission from the copyright holder.
nothing really unless you have permission to use it
Yes, an altered image is still considered copyrighted as long as the alterations do not significantly change the original work and the alterations are not substantial enough to create a new, separate copyright.
Yes, so long as it is a public domain image, and not a copyrighted one.
Not without a license.
To use others' copyrighted works, you need an exemption in the law (such as fair use) or permission from the copyright holder.
It is permissible to use a copyrighted image if you cite the source it came from.
No; by printing it, you have infringed on the rightsholder's exclusive right of duplication.
It is safest to assume that any image created since 1923 is protected by copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Yes, unless you own the copyright to the image, or have authorization from the copyright holder.