The Philippines will be the number one target of all terrorist in the world.. cause we haven't enough defense or the philippine national defense is to weak to defend the whole country cause we don't have budget for national defense!
the nuclear power plant will serve as the nuclear bomb of our own country.. LOL
This depends on the type and power of the reactor; say tens of metric tons.
Japan gets a little more than a third of its power from nuclear plants. Since electricity from a plant is put on a power grid for distribution, and there is no way to designate power produced as for a specific area, one could say that Hiroshima gets about a third of its power from nuclear plants.
Most nuclear plants operate their whole lives entirely safely, but as we have seen in Japan recently, things can go wrong occasionally and its best not to have too many people living near the plant. Transmission lines from the plant at say 20 miles can easily bring the power to the city instaed.
lhghl\tly,;,hllfhktmkt'kt nyky
I would definitely say it's a supporter of nuclear power for clean electricity production only.
Yes. That's why nuclear inspectors put on coverings over everything except their eyes when they go into the plant, and then shower and put on their regular clothes and shoes on their way back out.
When discussing efficiency, it turns out that a conventional carrier is more efficient than a nuclear carrier. This is surprising to people, since it is a popular misnomer that more efficient implies superior in some way. Efficiency is actually the difference in energy produced when a fuel is burned in a power plant compared to the energy output of the plant. This takes into account mechanical and thermodynamic losses. In conventional power generation plants, the difference in energy is about 60%, while in a nuclear power plant, the difference is 66% [3]. This is to say that in a conventional power plant, 2/5 of the fuel is turned into useful power, while in a nuclear power plant, 1/3 of the fuel is turned into useful energy. This occurs because conventional power plants can generate steam at a higher temperature [4], therefore providing more force to the turbines.
About 19% of the electricity used is from nuclear power, but all the lower 48 states of the United States use some nuclear power. Alaska and Hawaii are separate. Electrical power is conducted on a grid. The power goes into the grid from various power stations, and is used by various users. If a power plant goes down, the grid distributes power continuously because other plants continue and take up the slack. There are not many people who can say their power comes from a specific power plant, and most of those are probably off grid users (people who generate their own power). One estimate is 180,000 families, which might be 900,000 people, are off grid. In addition, roughly 700,000 people who live in Alaska and 1,300,000 in Hawaii have power that does not come from nuclear plants. That totals about 2,180,000, or about 0.7% of the population of the United States who use no nuclear power.
a nuclear power station requires adequate cooling water, but that's true of any large power plant. The fuel can easily be delivered by road or rail, so no difficulty there. I would say the only areas not to be able to take nuclear plants are in highly populated places and large conurbations, and that is to prevent exposures to many people if there is an escape of radioactivity.
A nuclear power plant operates using nuclear fission, where the nucleus of an atom is split into smaller particles, releasing a large amount of energy in the process. This reaction generates heat that is used to produce steam to drive turbines and generate electricity. It is a controlled chain reaction that requires careful management to prevent overheating and meltdowns.
Currently, there are no nuclear power plants that use nuclear fusion for commercial energy production. Fusion has not yet been achieved at a sustained, commercial scale for power generation. Most nuclear power plants currently use nuclear fission.
Many would say the US was acting as an imperial power when it annexed the Philippines, not that it was being communist.