Want this question answered?
No, the right to an attorney only applies to a defendant in a criminal case.
They have(if in the Us) all the rights in the United States Constitution. But when someone is under arrest the arresting officer must read the person their Miranda Rights. Miranda rights are what you here on all those TV shows..."you have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to AN ATTORNEY. if you cannot afford an attorney one will be given to you" etc. This was established by Miranda v. Arizona case. and the right to counsel(an attorney) was established by the case; Gideon v. Wainwright.
Depends on whether they are the attorney of person (in that case yes) or the attorney of finance (in this case no)
In re Gault was a landmark US Supreme Court case in 1967 that established important due process rights for juveniles, including the right to notice of charges, the right to an attorney, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to confront witnesses. This case significantly improved procedural protections for juveniles in the juvenile justice system.
The defense attorney enters the case as early as he/she possibly can, usually right after the arraignment.
If the judge makes you pay a fine
The Dread Scott case was the Supreme Court case the stated that Congress did not have the right to ban slavery in states and that blacks were not citizens.
The right to remain silent, which is proved through the US Supreme Court Case Miranda v. Arizona. He has the right to an attorney. He has the right to a jury of his peers.
The right to have an attorney & be presented with the Crown's case prior to the trial.
It is the right of every U.S. citizen to represent themselves in any court of law. That being the case an attorney in such a situation is not mandatory but highly advisable.
The criminals have the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and they can appeal their case to a higher court
It affirmed the right to an attorney and was a case that led to the Miranda Rights that came about in Miranda vs Arizona.