he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it.
1908.
The ''plum pudding atomic model" is from J. J. Thomson, year 1904.
It proposed that cholera was caused/spread by bad vapours in the air.
Bohr formulated new explanation and theories to remove Rutherford defect in Rutherford atomic model thats why Bohr atomic model is better than Rutherford atomic model.
Ernest Rutherford's atomic model evolved from the plum pudding model to the nuclear model. In the plum pudding model, he proposed that atoms consist of a positively charged sphere with negatively charged electrons embedded in it. Upon conducting the gold foil experiment and observing that some alpha particles were deflected, he revised his model to include a dense, positively charged nucleus at the center of the atom, surrounded by orbiting electrons. This became known as the nuclear model of the atom.
Rutherford's theory is known as the Rutherford model or Rutherford atomic model. It describes the structure of an atom as a dense positively charged nucleus surrounded by orbiting electrons.
The Bohr model of the atom was the first to propose that electrons orbit the nucleus in fixed paths or energy levels. This model was proposed by Niels Bohr in 1913, and it helped to explain the stability of atoms and the emission of specific frequencies of light.
Ernest Rutherford created the nuclear model of an atom!
The Rutherford model proposed that an atom's positive charge is concentrated in a dense center called the nucleus. This model was based on the famous gold foil experiment conducted by Ernest Rutherford in 1909.
atoms
Niels Bohr revised Rutherford's atomic model by incorporating the idea of quantized electron energy levels, proposing that electrons orbit the nucleus in specific energy levels or shells. This model explained the stability of atoms and how they emit and absorb light energy in discrete amounts.
its was Ernest Rutherford who proposed the planetary atomic model