Want this question answered?
There is no court that supervises all other courts. You may be confusing supervision with the lower courts' obligation to uphold precedents set by the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court doesn't "supervise" them, however.
The main job of the Supreme Court is to uphold the US Constitution. It is the highest court in the US and its job is to interpret the meaning of the law.
When the court upholds the validity of your appeal, it means that the court has reviewed your appeal and has found that it meets the legal requirements for consideration. This does not necessarily mean that your appeal will be successful in overturning the original decision, but rather that it can proceed to a full review by the court.
Not to practice idolatryNot to commit incest or adulteryNot to murderNot to eat the limb of a living animalNot to curse GodNot to stealTo uphold courts of law.See also the Related Link.Link: Do Jewish ideas apply to the Jews only?
Appellate courts in the Judicial Branch have jurisdiction (power, authority) to review and uphold lower court decisions on appeal.Decisions can only be enforced by the Executive Branch.
The types of rulings are to uphold ,or keep the original decision made by the district court , reverse the district court's decision , or remand the case.
No! Judges are NEVER in positions of power to please the government! They are there to make sure LAWS are applied equally in Courts and to uphold those laws.
Uphold is the correct spelling.
In general, state and federal courts have increasingly accepted DNA evidence as admissible. The first state appellate court decision to uphold the admission of DNA evidence was in 1988 (Andrews v. Florida, 533 So. 2d 841 [Fla. App.]), and the first major federal court decision to uphold its admission occurred in Jakobetz. By the mid-1990s, most states' courts admitted DNA test results into evidence.
Uphold the Law.
The past tense of uphold is upheld.
It is important to uphold the law.