answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There were a few challenges that have advances in technology for Supreme court. This was what interpret the Bill of Rights.

User Avatar

Dwight Gislason

Lvl 13
1y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

There were a few challenges that have advances in technology for Supreme court. This was what interpret the Bill of Rights.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What challenges have advances in technology posed for supreme court justices trying to interpret the bill of rights?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Prefer justices who will interpret the law in a strict constructionist manner.?

Conservatives


Who prefer justices who will interpret the law in a strict constructionist manner?

Conservatives


What laws govern a Supreme Court Justice and Justices' decisions?

The Supreme Court Justices interpret and enforce the US Constitution. The US Constitution is the ultimate "Law of the Land", to which they are bound.


On what issues did Justices Ginsburg and Breyer agree in the Grokster case?

Justices Ginsburg and Breyer agreed that a company should be liable for the illegal use of its technology in the Grokster case. The company is only liable if it actively promotes the illegal uses of its technology.


Justices in which court are appointed for life?

The Supreme Court sit for life. The thinking on this was they would be free of political restrictions and policies to be able to interpret law according to the constitution.


Should supreme court justices be elected instead of appointment?

The election process, especially the fundraising part, might influence how they interpret the law, introducing the potential of compromising their impartiality.


What are the duties of the Supreme Court?

judges if laws and acts of the legislative and executive branches are constitutional


How are the superme cout justices chosen?

at the time of election for new justices the president nominates the justices and the senate approves the nominated justices.


There are justices on the supreme courthow mean justices on the supreme court are there?

there are about how mean justices on the Supreme Court.


Can the president amend the US Constitution.?

No. The president has no direct part in amending the Constitution. He can lobby for Constitutional changes and if given the opportunity, can nominate Supreme Court justices who may interpret the Constitution in ways that amount that amount to changes.


What is the term when courts use social norms to interpret the constitution and present laws?

The interpretive theory is known as contextualism, but judges or justices who are proponents of contextualism (and/or a Living Constitution) are often also accused of being judicial activists.


How did the justices of the peace help queen elizabeth?

Justices of the peace!the justices of the peace was a police man.