answersLogoWhite

0

Some changes could be : a huge lost in icome for Qubec from Canada, it will probably be in debt. -alyssa kozlowski

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What changes in Canada could occur if quebec is granted independence?

that Quebec woukd only speak french language


What changes could occur if quebec was granted independence?

i dont know but who cares anyway


Did World War I make Canada an independent nation?

Canada was granted its independence as a Dominion by Great Britain on July 1st, 1867, many years before the start of World War 1 in 1914. However, it was at the Battle of Vimy Ridge that Canada's new identity was forged in the eyes of the world. Despite out independence from Britain in 1867, we were still viewed as a colony of Britain, and it was at Vimy Ridge that we proved to the world that we could operate without British support, and gained acceptance and respect in the international community.


He declared himself dictator?

No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.


What year did Canada break away from Britain?

Because of their parliament. Britain let them have their own parliament and the Canadians set it up so they could survive on their own. This was their plan, to break away from Great Britain after World War 2, while the British were weak. Therefore the British wouldn't fight to get it back. Also, the Americans would have aided Canada in a fight against Britain anyways, because many Americans want Canada to be part of the U.S. Save __ Canada gained independence but retained ties with Britain. There was no plan, or need to fight for independence (despite what the above person seems to think). In 1867, the Dominion of Canada was formed, so Canada was independent long before WW2. Canada was became a country (no longer a colony) with the passing if the BNA in 1867. It was an Act of British Parliament that granted independence. To this day Canada is still a member of the Commonwealth and the Queen of England is also the Queen of Canada (although the role is strictly ceremonial).


Could the thirteen colonies have declared indepence if they were not unanimous?

As to the question of whether the 13 colonies could have declared independence if they weren't unanimous, answers will vary. Most might state that independence would be difficult without the support of all thirteen colonies, but some might say independence without consensus was still possible. For instance, colonies that objected could be absorbed into Canada or find a way to peacefully co-exist with those that seceded.


Should Canadians have had a War for Independence like the Americans did?

What for? Just so young men could die in the prime of their lives? Get serious! Canada achieved independence through peaceful, lawful, and democratic means. We became a country through legislative evolution, not armed and violent revolution.


Did ancient roman slaves marry?

At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.At certain times they could marry, but it all depended upon permission being granted by their masters.


Was Canada part of great Britain in 1850?

No. It was still a British colony. Confederation was formalized in 1867, at which point Canada became the Dominion of Canada. While still a British possession, there was a move toward more independence, as the colonies were becoming very expensive to maintain for the British Crown. We had certain obligations to Britain, for instance, we had to go to war if they declared it. After World War I, Canada more or less gained complete independence from Britain, with one holdover, the British North America Act (in effect, the Canadian constitution), which remained a British act, and could only be modified by their parliament. In 1982, the Constitution was formally repatriated to Canada, at which point we had total independence to conduct our own affairs.


Why was lord Baltimore granted a charter?

He was Granted a charter so he could establish the Maryland colony. It was going to be a catholic colony, but My Protestants can in then Catholics.


Who in rome was considered a citizen?

A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.A Roman citizen was any freeborn person born in Rome of Roman parents. A citizen could also be the child of a freedman, or someone who was granted citizenship, either as an individual or as a member of a town or territory that was granted citizenship.


What reasons did McKinley argue that Philippines should not be granted their independence?

McKinley argued that the Philippines were not ready for self-government and needed American guidance to transition effectively. He believed that the Filipinos would not be able to govern themselves efficiently and may fall into chaos without US oversight. Additionally, he thought that granting independence too soon could endanger American strategic interests in the region.